Mining Subsidies: $3.5 billion
a year
excerpted from the book
Take the Rich Off Welfare
by Mark Zepezauer and Arthur
Naiman
Odonian Press, 1996
Mining Subsidies: $3.5 billion
a year
Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt was visibly
angry. He was about to sign away federal land containing $68 million
in gold for a total price of $540, but he had no choice. The best
he could do was hold a news conference that featured a giant gift-wrapped
box, and call the deal "a massive rip-off of the taxpayers."
Babbitt's hands were tied by a law that
had been passed 123 years earlier, in the ultra-corrupt administration
of Ulysses S. Grant. Called the Mining Law of 1872, it was originally
designed to encourage settlement of the West.
The Law of '72 allows anyone-including
foreign corporations-to search for minerals on public lands and,
when they find them, to "patent" the mineral rights
at the 1872 price- which is never more than $5 an acre! (Patenting
means the company gets to use the land as long as it's mining
it.) More than 3.2 million acres-an area almost the size of Connecticut-have
been given away at these ridiculous prices.
A Canadian mining company called American
Barrick is in the process of extracting more than $10 billion
in gold-$83 3/4 billion so far-from land in Nevada it paid $5,190
for. The Chevron and Manville corporations hope to lay their hands
on about $4 billion worth of platinum and palladium; to patent
the Montana acre where the minerals are found, they'll pay about
$10,000.
Royalties? We don't pay no stinkin' royalties,
Since 1872, about $245 billion worth of minerals have been mined
from public lands. And how much has our government collected in
royalties? Absolutely nothing. Royalties aren't mentioned in the
Law of '72, nor in any mining law since.
If a conservative 8% royalty rate had
been charged on that $245 billion, we'd be almost $20 billion
richer. And at that same 8% rate, the $33/4 billion in minerals
that are currently being pulled out of public lands each year
would earn the Treasury about $300 million a year.
A moratorium on mining claims has been
declared while Congress tries to decide what to do about the Law
of '72 (it's survived many challenges before, but maybe this time
we'll be able to drive a golden stake through its heart). Of the
approximately $34 billion in proven mineral reserves still left
on public lands, 46% were in the process of being claimed when
the moratorium went into effect.
But wait-there's more
The worst thing about the Law of '72 is
that it doesn't require companies to clean up after themselves
when they're done mining and return the patented land. Right now
we're looking at cleanup costs of $32 to $72 billion for abandoned
mines on public lands. Let's split the difference and say the
cleanup costs $52 billion. If the cleanup takes twenty years,
that will amount to $2.6 billion a year.
As if the Law of '72 weren't enough, mining
companies enjoy a number of other tax write-offs. The reclamation
deduction allows them to begin deducting the eventual closing
costs of a mine as soon as it's opened, instead of when those
costs actually occur. Needless to say, there's no requirement
that the money the reclamation deduction saves the mining companies
be set aside in a trust fund for the eventual reclamation of the
mine. Eliminating this deduction would earn the Treasury about
$40 million a year.
Mining companies can deduct 85% of the
projected costs of exploring for certain minerals (finding the
site, determining the quantity and quality of the minerals on
it, and digging of shafts and tunnels) in the first year of mining,
rather than over the life of the mine. And they can treat the
sale of coal and iron as capital gains rather than as ordinary
income.
These two tax loopholes cost us $135 million
a year, but since they're already included in the totals for the
accelerated depreciation and capital gains chapters, we won't
count them again here.
The percentage depletion allowance
Finally, there's the percentage depletion
allowance, another ancient law that's still on the books. It lets
mining companies take a set percentage of the gross income they
derive from a mine off their taxable incomes, and continue to
do that for as long as that mine is producing (Presumably this
compensates them for the fact that they're depleting their source
of income by mining it. Or did you think that the money they make
selling the minerals was supposed to do that?)
The percentage depletion allowance varies
depending on what's being mined; it ranges from 10% for clay,
sand and gravel to 22% for uranium, sulphur and lead. (Note that
some of the most toxic substances have the highest allowances.)
Just as with its twin, the oil depletion
allowance, this tax break can end up being worth many times what
it cost to dig the mine. When mining companies end up making more
money from a tax write-off than they've invested in the mine,
that means we've invested more in their mine than they have. Eliminating
this allowance would save us $560 million a year.
Let's add things up. Royalty-free mining
runs $300 million a year. Not requiring miners to clean up after
themselves costs about $2.6 billion a year. The reclamation deduction
runs $40 million a year and the percentage depletion allowance
$560 million. That comes to a total of $3.5 billion a year.
Take
the Rich Off Welfare
Index
of Website
Home Page