Democrats, DOA
The People's Prayer
excerpted from the book
Stupid White Men
and other Sorry Excuses for
the State of the Nation
by Michael Moore
ReganBooks, 2001
p209
Democrats, DOA
He has signed a bill providing for federal
funds to be distributed to "faith-based" charitable
organizations.
He has expanded the number of federal
crimes for which the death penalty can be given to a total of
sixty.
He has signed a bill outlawing gay marriages
and has taken out ads on Christian radio stations touting his
opposition to any form of legal same-sex couplings.
In a short span of time, he has been able
to kick ten million people off welfare-that's ten million out
of fourteen million total recipients.
He has promised states "bonus funds"
if they can reduce their welfare numbers further, and made it
easier to get these funds by not requiring the states to help
the ex-welfare recipients find jobs.
He has introduced a plan that would bar
any assistance to teenage parents if they drop out of school or
leave their parents' home.
Though he is careful not to draw attention
to it, he supports many of the old provisions of Newt Gingrich's
"Contract With America," including lowering the capital
gains tax.
In spite of calls from Republican governors
like George Ryan of Illinois to support a moratorium on capital
punishment, he rejected all efforts to slow down the number of
executions even after it was revealed that there are dozens of
people on death row who are innocent.
He has released funds for local communities
to hire over a hundred thousand new police officers and supports
laws that put people behind bars for life after committing three
crimes-even if those crimes were shoplifting or not paying for
a pizza.
There are now more people in America without
health insurance than when he took office.
He has signed orders prohibiting any form
of health care to poor people who are in the United States illegally.
He supports a ban on late-term abortions
and promised to sign the first bill to cross his desk that includes
an exemption only if the life of the mother is in jeopardy.
He has signed an order prohibiting any
U.S. funds going to any country to be used in helping women secure
an abortion.
He signed a one-year gag order that prohibits
using any federal funds in foreign countries where birth control
agencies mention abortion as an option to pregnant women.
He has refused to sign the international
Land Mine Ban Treaty already signed by 137 nations-but not by
Iraq, Libya, North Korea, or the United States.
He has scuttled the Kyoto Protocol by
insisting that "sinks" (e.g., farmlands and forests)
be counted toward the U.S. percentage of emissions reductions,
thus making a mockery of the whole treaty (which was written primarily
to reduce the carbon dioxide pollution from cars and factories).
He has accelerated drilling for gas and
oil on federal lands at a pace that matches, and in some areas
exceeds, the production level during the Reagan administration.
He has approved the sale of one California
oil field in the largest privatization deal in American history,
and he opened the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (something
even Reagan wasn't able to do).
And he became the first President since
Richard Nixon not to force the auto manufacturers to improve their
mileage per gallon-which would have saved millions of barrels
of oil each day.
Yes, you'd have to agree, considering
all of his above accomplishments, that Bill Clinton was one of
the best Republican Presidents we've ever had.
There has been much hand-wringing since
George W. Bush was given the office, with good people and liberals
everywhere freaked out that the son-of-a-Bush would wreak havoc
with the environment, turn back the clock on women's rights, and
have us all reciting prayers in schools and at traffic lights.
They are right to be concerned.
But Bush is only the uglier and somewhat
meaner version of what we already had throughout the nineties-except
that back then it came dressed in a charming smile from a guy
who played soul tunes on a sax and told us what kind of underwear
he (and his interns) wore. We liked that. It felt good, normal.
He could sing the Black National Anthem. He partied with Gloria
Steinem. He watched my show! I liked the guy!
We were all relieved that the Reagan/Bush
years were over, and it was kind of cool that we had a President
who had smoked pot and called himself "the first Black President
of the United States." But we had a tendency to turn our
heads the other way and block out things like his undermining
key provisions of the Kyoto Agreement just weeks before the November
2000 election.
We didn't want to know about stuff like
that; after all, what was our alternative? Baby Bush? Pat Buchanan?
Ralph Nader?
Oh, God, no-not Ralph Nader. Why on earth
would we want to support someone who agreed with us on all the
issues? That's no fun!
The anger now leveled at Nader seems so
personal, so intense, from Baby Boomers who blame him for Gore
losing the election (he didn't lose). I look at these individuals
in the their forties and fifties and I wonder why Nader seems
so personally threatening to them.
It's taken a while, but I think I've got
it figured out: Nader represents who they used to be but no longer
are. He never changed. He never lost the faith, never compromised,
never gave up. That's why they hate him. He didn't change his
tune, didn't move to the suburbs, didn't start structuring his
life around "Let's see how I can make the most money for
me, me, ME!" He didn't conform to the new Baby Boom Code
of Sell-Out Ethics in order to advance his power. No wonder millions
of high school and college kids love him. He's the opposite of
their parents, the people who "raised" them by handing
them a latchkey, a Ritalin, and a remote for the TV set in the
bedroom. Nader didn't make the trek down the dial from Sgt. Pepper
to AOR to Kenny G.
p213
... Go with the winner! Even if the winner (Clinton) supports
executing people, won't ban land mines, signs gag orders, prevents
abortion funding, throws the poor out on the street, doubles the
prison population, bombs four different countries, killing innocent
civilians (Sudan, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Yugoslavia), allows a
few conglomerates to own most of the media (which once were split
up among nearly a thousand companies), and continually calls for
increases in the Pentagon budget, it still feels better than .
. . better than. . . well, better than something really, really
bad.
Friends, when are we going to stop kidding
ourselves? Clinton, and most other contemporary Democrats, did
not and will not do what is best for us or the world we live in.
We don't pay their bill-the top 10 percent do, and it is their
will that will always be done. I know you already know this; it's
just hard to say it because the alternative looks so much like
. . . Dick Cheney.
p215
So is there a difference between Democrats and Republicans? Sure.
The Democrats say one thing ("Save the planet!") and
then do another-quietly holding hands behind the scenes with the
bastards who make this world a dirtier, meaner place. The Republicans
just come right out and give the bastards a corner office in the
West Wing. That's the difference.
p216
Bill Clinton waited until the final days of his presidency to
sign a raft of presidential decrees and regulations, many of which
promised to improve our environment and create safer working conditions.
It was the ultimate cynical move. Wait till the last 48 hours
of your term to do the right thing, so that everyone will look
back and think, now he was a good president. But Clinton knew
these last minute orders would all fall under the hand of the
new administration coming to power. He knew none of these orders
would stand.
It was all about image.
Do you still believe Clinton removed arsenic
from our water? Not only had he done nothing to protect us from
drinking arsenic-laced water for the last eight years-but the
order he signed stipulated that the arsenic was not to be removed
from the water "until 2004." That's right. Look it up.
Clinton's big environmental gesture in the last minutes of his
term guaranteed that we'd be drinking the same levels of arsenic
we've been drinking since 1942-the last time a REAL Democrat had
the guts to stand up to the mining interests and reduce the levels
of this poison. The Canadians and Europeans did it long ago. But
Clinton ignored the law that required the EPA to reduce arsenic
levels. That resulted in a lawsuit against the Clinton administration
by the Natural Resources Defense Council. In his last week Clinton
finally caved in-but only after inserting language that would
put off the change for four-years. Thus Clinton made it official
that we would all be drinking this poison during the entire Bush
administration. Maybe he was doing us a favor.
And how about those carbon dioxide emission
regulations Bush II overturned? Did I say "overturned"?
Overturned what? All Bush did was maintain the Clinton status
quo. He said, in essence, "I'm going to pollute the air at
the very same levels Clinton did during his entire eight years,
just as you're going to drink the same arsenic in the water under
my watch as you did under Clinton's."
And, like the built-in four-year delay
in his arsenic reductions, Clinton's orders on the toxic emissions
in his last days specified that they were not to be reduced immediately
either. In mid-November, sensing the fate of the election, he
called for strict regulations on four greenhouse gases, including
carbon dioxide. Again, his words sounded nice, but if you looked
past them you found the new levels wouldn't be in place until
2010. And then, as if that wasn't bad enough, no new regulation
could be implemented for another ten to 15 years.
The list goes on and on. For eight years
Clinton did NOTHING about carpal tunnel syndrome as it relates
to OSHA regulations. Then, in the middle of pardoning some rich
guys during his all-night Agonistes on January 19, he finally
decided to do some good for all those women who sit at keyboards
all day and who, with their crippled hands, went to the polls
TWICE to make him their President.
Friends, you are being misled and hoodwinked
by a bunch of professional "liberals" who did NOTHING
themselves for eight years to clean up these messes-and who now
can't stop themselves from attacking people like Ralph Nader,
who has devoted his entire life to every single one of these causes.
What unmitigated gall! They blame Nader for giving us Bush? I
blame THEM for being Bush! They suck off the same corporate teat
...
p222
So spare me all the moaning about Bush the Lesser. Those who want
to turn Bush into some sort of cartoon monster have an agenda-to
keep most of us from seeing the beast they themselves have become.
Of course they hate Ralph Nader. He's a disquieting reminder of
what could happen if we ever elect someone who will represent
the bottom 90 percent in this country. Blame Nader, blame Bush,
it's all part of the same distraction-to keep you from focusing
on one very important fact: Republican arsenic or Democratic arsenic,
it really is the same damn crap being forced down your throat.
But Bush will never figure out how to
get away with this stuff the way Clinton did. He needs to take
a page out of Clinton's Big Book of Charm. Now, there was a guy
who knew how to win people over. Whatever you thought of him,
he was likable, smart, funny, and down-to-earth. He knew that
the American people want to believe in their President. He discovered
that saying something was the same as doing it. If you said you
were for a clean environment,
that was good enough-you didn't have to
do anything to make it a clean environment. Hell, you could get
away with polluting it more, and most people would never know
the difference. You could say you were pro-choice and then preside
over the largest wholesale closing of abortion clinics since the
procedure became legal. (What's the point of being pro-choice
if, in 86 percent of the counties in America, there is not a single
doctor who will perform an abortion and not a single woman who
can get one?) Clinton learned that by talking a good feminist
line, he could arrange it so that not one feminist leader would
decry the order he signed in 1999 to deny federal funds to any
foreign group that discussed abortion during consultations. Everyone
thinks that was Bush's idea! That's how smart Clinton was. And
that's why he got all the women's groups on his side-because he
said he was with them.
So that's how you do it. Say one (plausible)
thing; then do another. Or do nothing.
The point of all this is that our real
problem, ultimately, isn't Bush-it's the Democrats. Bush would
be paralyzed if the Democrats started behaving like a true opposition
party. Bush wouldn't even be there had one Democrat in the House
stood up and challenged the votes of the electoral college. But
no one said anything.
And for the better part of Bush's first
year, it's Democrats who have been Bush's willing and necessary
partners to madness.
Start with the Bankruptcy Reform Act,
which will make life much harder for working people who need to
file for bankruptcy. Instead of having their debts expunged, this
new law, passed by both houses of Congress and signed by Bush,
will now force those who have lost everything to remain indebted
to banks and credit card companies-and find ways to pay them off.
In other words, millions will never crawl out from under the rock
of crushing debt.
This bill was passed with the support
of thirty-seven Democratic senators-including every single female
Democratic senator-all of whom sided with the banking industry
instead of with America's working families. In an ironic twist,
it was the millionaire Democrats in the Senate-Kennedy, Rockefeller,
Corzine, Dayton-who voted against this repressive piece of legislation.
Bill after bill that came from the Bush-occupied
White House to the Congress found scores of Democrats with open
arms. The Bush tax cut bill passed overwhelmingly with Democratic
support, even though the bill was designed to benefit the richest
10 percent in the country.
Democrats have also backed Bush on his
bombing of Iraq and his aggressive actions toward China. In August
2001, the crowning moment of this collaboration came when the
House voted to approve drilling for oil in the Alaskan wilderness.
Thirty-four Republicans had already jumped ship and said they
would vote against their own party on this issue. That was stunning
news to those who were concerned about our environment. But the
joy soon subsided once the vote was taken-and thirty-six Democrats
voted in favor of the Bush plan.
The saddest spectacle in this orgy of
Democrats sleeping with the enemy was the way they approved every
single one of Bush's cabinet nominations. Some appointees had
the unanimous support of the Democrats in the Senate; even controversial
ones, like John Ashcroft, picked up a number of crucial Democratic
votes. And not a single Democratic senator was willing to filibuster
the way a rabid Republican would have if a Democratic President
had selected such a fringe radical as Ashcroft to be attorney
general. If I recall, Janet Reno was choice number three for Clinton:
the first two nominees were rejected after Republicans went nuts
over their views on nannies.
But that's the difference-Democrats have
no spine. They always back down. There is no one on their side
of the aisle willing to go to battle for us the way a Tom Delay
or Trent Lott will for his side. Those guys will not rest until
they win, no matter how many bodies the road is littered with.
Democrats have become nothing more than
Republican wannabes. And so I propose a course of action: the
Democrats must merge with the Republican Party. That way, they
can keep doing what they both do very well-representing the rich-and
save a lot of money by consolidating staff and headquarters into
one tight, fit fighting machine for the top 10 percent.
***
The People's Prayer
p231
There's nothing more lovable than an unembarrassed hypocrite from
the Right. They spend their entire lives making everyone else's
life miserable, but as soon as a little misery enters their lives,
then it's "Belief system be damned-I want results!"
They devote all their energies for years to making it hard for
blacks, chicks, or guys who like guys to get ahead or be treated
with an ounce of dignity, but the minute someone in their family
is being held back-whoa, you better get outta my kid's way, buster-he's
special!
Reagan, Bush, Cheney, and the whole Lott
of them are responsible for decades of cruel legislation designed
to punish the poor, imprison those with health problems (drug
addictions), or strip rights from desperate people here in America
"illegally." But when they find themselves in a desperate
situation, suddenly they have the compassion of St. Francis and
the mercy of Mother Teresa.
The rich and powerful make it their mission
in life to destroy our air, poison our water, rip us off, and
make it impossible for us to get any sort of help at the customer
service window, but when their actions come back to haunt them
they aren't spooked - they're looking for a handout.
Stupid
White Men
Index
of Website
Home Page