Reagan Was Behind "One
Of The Most Intensive Campaigns
Of Mass Murder In Recent History
Journalist Allan Nairn
interviewed by Amy Goodman
Democracy Now!, Tuesday,
June 8th, 2004
Allan Nairn, veteran investigative
journalist and activist, who has won a number of awards for his
reporting in Central America, from El Salvador to Guatemala, discusses
Reagan's foreign policy couched as a war against communism.
AMY GOODMAN: As we turn now to Allan Nairn,
journalist and activist, won a number of awards for his reporting
in Central America from El Salvador to Guatemala, wrote for the
"New Republic," "The Nation," The Progressive."
Allan, we are now hearing in the United States a great deal about
Reagan foreign policy couched as a war against communism. Can
you respond to that and talk specifically about Guatemala and
El Salvador?
ALLAN NAIRN: Well, communism was the excuse
for what Reagan did in Central America, but the victims were not
Communists. The victims were priests and peasants and labor leaders
and residents and student leaders and academics and journalists
and others who -- especially in the late 1970's both in Guatemala
and Salvador had coalesced into strong popular movements. The
thing they were responding to was the fact that in both those
countries, hundreds of thousands of people every year were dying
unnecessarily from malnutrition, from diarrhea, from malaria,
people were living on hillsides trying to eke out a living on
corn crops that could only feed a family for three or four months
because the plot was so small because the larger owners had all
the good land. People tried to find a peaceful solution to this
preventable death mainly of children. In many villages in Guatemala
and El Salvador half of the kids would die through peaceful means.
Through strikes on the plantations where they would ask for an
extra 40 cents a day in wages, strikes in places like the Coca-Cola
plant in Guatemala, calls for enforcement of the real minimum
wage.
The response to this by the militaries
of El Salvador and Guatemala in both cases backed by the Reagan
administration, the response was death squads. In Guatemala they
had named like the Malablanca, the White Hand, the S.R., the Secret
Anti-Communist army. They would often pass out leaflets listing
the names of the people they intended to execute. Sometimes they
were illustrated with the photos. They complied. They would follow
up. They would roam the streets and in vans and would come into
houses in the middle of night wearing hoods. They would drag people
away, and in the next few days their mutilated bodies would turn
up by the roadside often with the genitals removed, stuffed in
the mouth, hands severed. This was effective. It worked. The popular
movements in both Salvador and Guatemala were crushed. And in
response, many of the survivors went to the hills. They joined
up with the very small, until that time, guerrilla groups, several
of which had a Communist ideology and were backed by Cuba, and
they tried to fight that way. When they did that, that was seen
by Reagan and his people, Alexander Hague, the Secretary of State,
Jean Kirkpatrick, Elliot Abrams, the Human Rights and Latin American
chief, John Negroponte, the ambassador to Honduras, this was seen
as a strategic success because it made it that much easier politically
for the U.S. to justify what it was doing. They can say, see,
we're fighting Communists. We're fighting an armed insurgency.
That's why we're backing these governments. What they backed was
really one of the most intensive campaigns of mass murder in recent
history. In Guatemala during Reagan's time, about 200,000 civilians
were massacred. A couple of thousand of armed guerrillas were
killed in combat. In Salvador, probably on the order of 70,000
civilians massacred, again a couple of them were armed guerillas
killed in combat.
When Reagan was running for president
against Carter in 1980 his campaign and foreign policy team actually
sent emissaries to Guatemala. They met with the military chiefs
and the heads of CASIF, which was the Guatemalan chambers of commerce,
agriculture, industry and finance, the convening body. They told
them, according to the discussions that I had with the people
that they met with, that once Reagan came to office, they would
have a freer hand. They had been getting some criticism from the
State Departments of Ford and then Carter and the U.S. Congress
to its credit had brought correct and direct U.S. arms sales to
Guatemala. So, with approval from National Security Adviser to
President Carter, Israel stepped in to fill the gap and was selling
automatic rifles and Uzi submachine guns and transport planes
and military goods to Guatemala, but they had to do it indirectly.
The U.S. was -- it was difficult for the Guatemalan army. Reagan's
campaign emissaries told the death squad chieftains and the oligarchy
and the military, don't worry, when we come in, you'll get a free
hand. That's basically what happened. One of the people that went
down on behalf of president Reagan was Vernon Walters, who was
his special emissary to Guatemala.
The ruler of Guatemala was General Lucas
Garcia. Under his reign, the military focused its attacks on unions
and on peasant groups, and also on the Catholic Church, which
they saw as a subversive force because it was telling the poor
that they also were humans in the sight of God, that they had
rights and they had the right to ask for more. On two occasions,
they actually -- the military death squads actually went in and
abducted the entire labor leadership of Guatemala which was holding
conventions. They picked them all up. They disappeared never to
be seen again. Walters went down, met publicly with General Lucas
and embraced him and said, we love your devotion to peace, liberty
and constitutional institutions. About a year-and-a-half later,
when General Lucas was replaced by General Luis Mans, who took
power in a coup, the strategy shifted. Mans shifted to the countryside,
the Mayan highlands of the northwest where the indigenous population,
and especially old and brave, and they were more impoverished
than the people of the cities, and they had risen against the
armies. They sent the army sweeping through the villages of the
highlands and actually saw military documents where they estimated
that 662 rural villages were, in other words, annihilated. They
would go into the villages. They would gather everyone in the
square. They would tell them that the army had arrived, that they
were only -- their only hope for survival was to come to the good
to renounce those who were against the army and then they would
read from lists compiled by the military intelligence of people
who were supposedly giving food to the guerrillas or working with
the priests or working with organizers, and then they would execute
them in front of the other villagers. They would shoot them in
the head with their Uzis. They would make their neighbors -- dig
a pit into which the bodies were thrown and then they would often
grab several people from the crowd, shoot them at random, often
the children. Then as they left, they would burn the homes, slaughter
the farm animals and they did this day after day after day. On
some days, three and four and five villages would be taken out
in this manner. They would leave behind these burning hulks, decapitated
bodies, often hundreds slaughtered at a time.
Then in the midst of this campaign, Reagan
personally went to Central America, met with General Luis Mans
and said that Guatemala was getting a bum rap on human rights.
There was a similar story in neighboring El Salvador. As with
Guatemala, the U.S. policy of backing terror and backing an oligarchy
which lived high while many thousands of children died from hunger,
the U.S. policy of backing them went back a long way. In Guatemala
in 1954, Eisenhower had sent them the C.I.A. to overthrow the
democratically-elected government and put the army in power. Likewise
in Salvador, a sophisticated military death squad apparatus had
been built up under a program launched under JFK, the Kennedy
Administration which actually sent in C.I.A. and State Department
and Green Beret people to set up a communications system, at that
time a radio teletype, which was the technology of the day, which
linked the intelligence services of Guatemala, Salvador, Nicaragua,
Honduras, and they would exchange across borders information they
had gathered on subversives, information they had gathered with
C.I.A. assistance in files that they-I have actually been shown
some of the files in Salvador by the officers explaining how the
C.I.A. technicians had shown them how to put them together and
maintain them. This was before the advent and wide use of computers.
They did it with paper. But they managed to find their victims.
Through the 1960's and 1970's, they carried out many assassinations.
But when Reagan came in, it became larger scale. It became more
systematic.
Reagan's chief foreign policy thinker,
Jean Kirkpatrick, who became his advisor to the UN actually by
some accounts got her job in the Administration, first came to
the attention of Reagan and his inner circle when she wrote an
essay for the American Enterprise Institute in which she explicitly
praised the operations of the Salvador ran death squads. This
is the essay in which she put forward her idea that the U.S. should
be backing authoritarian governments like those of Guatemala and
Salvador, and she referred to the Martinez Brigades, which was
one of the death squads in Salvador, which was named off an old
Salvadoran General had staged a massacre of tens of thousands
of peasants as U.S. naval warships hovered offshore. Kirkpatrick
said that the modern day death squads who carried on in his name,
invoked his name because he was seen as a civic hero by the Salvadoran
people. Kirkpatrick was saying that these death squads were admired
by the people because they restored a civic order. By putting
forth the theory, she gained attention of the administration and
became a driver of the foreign policy, and under Reagan, the U.S.
not only gave extensive covert backing, as was done in Guatemala,
but also overt. They sent in Green Berets, U.S. Army troops who
openly assisted the Salvadoran military, National Guard and Treasury
Police.
At one point, there was a -- at the time
there was a famous incident in which a group of American nuns
and church workers were waylaid on a road, abducted by elements
of the troops of the Salvadoran National Guard. They were raped
and murdered. Afterward, Alexander Hague, Reagan's Secretary of
State, suggested that they had died in an exchange of gunfire,
that these were pistol-packing nuns who apparently got what they
deserved. Jean Kirkpatrick said that, well these were not real
nuns. She suggested that they were up to some -- they were up
to no good, perhaps helping the poor of El Salvador. One of the
people who in the mid 1980's from 1984 to 1986 actually ran the
U.S. military operation in El Salvador, Colonel James Steel, who
is currently in Baghdad. He is the counselor for Iraqi security
forces to Bremer. He's in charge of putting together and training
the Iraqi security forces. Elliot Abrams, who was really second
only to Kirkpatrick as an ideologue and planner of the Central
American massacres is now running Middle East policy at the National
Security Council for the Bush Administration.
AMY GOODMAN: Allan Nairn, I want to thank
you very much for being with us. We have 30 seconds. Last comment,
as you reflect back on the 1980's in Central America?
ALLAN NAIRN: Well, I think if accurate
history is written in the future this will be seen as one of the
great crimes of history, and I'm not in the U.S. now, but when
I -- I'm hearing about how Reagan is being celebrated, and I don't
know, I suspect that a lot of people in Central America when they
hear about that, maybe feel the same way that a lot of Americans
feel when they hear the stories about people in other countries
wearing Osama bin Laden t-shirts. You know, a feeling of just
complete dismay and disgust. How can people do that? How can people
celebrate such a mass killer? That's a complicated question.
There are various reasons why people celebrate
mass killers. One of them that especially applies in the case
of the U.S. is maybe they don't know. Maybe they don't know that
he was a mass murderer, and that is largely the case with what
happened in Central America because the way the U.S. press covered
it and failed to cover it the facts never got through to the American
public. If they did, people would not stand for it. But Reagan
-- one thing you have to say for Reagan, and one thing I think
you also have to say for Bush now, they justly and appropriately
for politics spoke in terms of good and evil. Because a lot of
politics a good and evil. But he lied about it. What he did was
evil. What Bush is doing now is evil when he causes the deaths
of civilians. Americans have to face the facts. They have to look
at things the way they really are, and then you can't do anything
about the victims of El Salvador and Guatemala now, but you can
do something about those who are still alive. For example, I mentioned
Coca-Cola and Guatemala: dozens of union organizers there were
gunned down by death squads. Almost the exact same things has
happened in recent years at the Coca-Cola franchise in Colombia.
One union leader pops up and he's gunned down. This practice is
continuing and it has to stop.
Allan
Nairn page
Index
of Website
Home Page