Holocaust Denial, American Style
Traditional U.S. media have refused
to acknowledge the massive number of Iraqis killed since the invasion.
by Mark Weisbrot
www.alternet.org, November 21,
2007
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad's
flirtation with those who deny the reality of the Nazi genocide
has rightly been met with disgust. But another holocaust denial
is taking place with little notice: the holocaust in Iraq. The
average American believes that 10,000 Iraqi civilians have been
killed since the US invasion in March 2003. The most commonly
cited figure in the media is 70,000. But the actual number of
people who have been killed is most likely more than one million.
This is five times more than the estimates
of killings in Darfur and even more than the genocide in Rwanda
13 years ago.
The estimate of more than one million
violent deaths in Iraq was confirmed again two months ago in a
poll by the British polling firm Opinion Research Business, which
estimated 1,220,580 violent deaths since the US invasion. This
is consistent with the study conducted by doctors and scientists
from the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health more
than a year ago. Their study was published in the Lancet, Britain's
leading medical journal. It estimated 601,000 people killed due
to violence as of July 2006; but if updated on the basis of deaths
since the study, this estimate would also be more than a million.
These estimates do not include those who have died because of
public health problems created by the war, including breakdowns
in sewerage systems and electricity, shortages of medicines, etc.
Amazingly, some journalists and editors
- and of course some politicians - dismiss such measurements because
they are based on random sampling of the population rather than
a complete count of the dead. While it would be wrong to blame
anyone for their lack of education, this disregard for scientific
methods and results is inexcusable. As one observer succinctly
put it: if you don't believe in random sampling, the next time
your doctor orders a blood test, tell him that he needs to take
all of it.
The methods used in the estimates of Iraqi
deaths are the same as those used to estimate the deaths in Darfur,
which are widely accepted in the media. They are also consistent
with the large numbers of refugees from the violence (estimated
at more than four million). There is no reason to disbelieve them,
or to accept tallies such as that the Iraq Body Count (73,305
- 84,222), which include only a small proportion of those killed,
as an estimate of the overall death toll.
Of course, acknowledging the holocaust
in Iraq might change the debate over the war. While Iraqi lives
do not count for much in US politics, recognizing that a mass
slaughter of this magnitude is taking place could lead to more
questions about how this horrible situation came to be. Right
now a convenient myth dominates the discussion: the fall of Saddam
Hussein simply unleashed a civil war that was waiting to happen,
and the violence is all due to Iraqis' inherent hatred of each
other.
In fact, there is considerable evidence
that the occupation itself - including the strategy of the occupying
forces - has played a large role in escalating the violence to
holocaust proportions. It is in the nature of such an occupation,
where the vast majority of the people are opposed to the occupation
and according to polls believe it is right to try and kill the
occupiers, to pit one ethnic group against another. This was clear
when Shiite troops were sent into Sunni Fallujah in 2004; it is
obvious in the nature of the death-squad government, where officials
from the highest levels of the Interior Ministry to the lowest
ranking police officers - all trained and supported by the US
military - have carried out a violent, sectarian mission of "ethnic
cleansing." (The largest proportion of the killings in Iraq
are from gunfire and executions, not from car bombs). It has become
even more obvious in recent months as the United States is now
arming both sides of the civil war, including Sunni militias in
Anbar province as well as the Shiite government militias.
Is Washington responsible for a holocaust
in Iraq? That is the question that almost everyone here wants
to avoid. So the holocaust is denied
Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director and co-founder
of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He received his
Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan. He is co-author,
with Dean Baker, of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University
of Chicago Press, 2000), and has written numerous research papers
on economic policy. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy.
Iraq page
Home Page