New World Order: Conspiracy or
Real World Order
excerpted from Ken Adachi's
New World Order (NWO)
The term New World Order (NWO) has been
used by numerous politicians through the ages, and is a generic
term used to refer to a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated
by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related
individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many
of the world's wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate
elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe
(dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One
World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional
boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda.
Listen to the Zionist* banker, Paul Warburg:
"We will have a world government
whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that
government will be achieved by conquest or consent." (February
17, 1950, as he testified before the US Senate).
Their intention is to effect complete
and total control over every human being on the planet and to
dramatically reduce the world's population by two thirds. While
the name New World Order is the term most frequently used today
to loosely refer to anyone involved in this conspiracy, the study
of exactly who makes up this group is a complex and intricate
one. For further research sources, please see the side bar on
In 1992, Dr John Coleman published Conspirators
Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300. With laudable scholarship
and meticulous research, Dr Coleman identifies the players and
carefully details the New World Order agenda of worldwide domination
and control. On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr Coleman
accurately summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee
of 300 as follows:
"A One World Government and one-unit
monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists
who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal
system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity,
population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children
per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who
are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly
and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.
There will be no middle class, only rulers
and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system
of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed
up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified
military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national
boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare
state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World
Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who
are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared
outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately
owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited."
Why the Conspiracy is Unknown
The sheer magnitude and complex web of
deceit surrounding the individuals and organizations involved
in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most astute
among us. Most people react with disbelief and skepticism towards
the topic, unaware that they have been conditioned (brainwashed)
to react with skepticism by institutional and media influences.
Author and de-programmer Fritz Springmeier (The Top 13 Illuminati
Bloodlines) says that most people have built in "slides"
that short circuit the mind's critical examination process when
it comes to certain sensitive topics. "Slides", Springmeier
reports, is a CIA term for a conditioned type of response which
dead ends a person's thinking and terminates debate or examination
of the topic at hand. For example, the mention of the word "conspiracy"
often solicits a slide response with many people.
What most people believe to be "Public
Opinion" is in reality carefully crafted and scripted propaganda
designed to elicit a desired behavioral response from the public.
Public opinion polls are really taken with the intent of gauging
the public's acceptance of the New World Order's planned programs.
A strong showing in the polls tells them that the programming
is "taking", while a poor showing tells the NWO manipulators
that they have to recast or "tweak" the programming
until the desired response is achieved.
The NWO Modus Operandi
The NWO global conspirators manifest their
agenda through the skilful manipulation of human emotions, especially
fear. In the past centuries, they have repeatedly utilized a contrivance
that NWO researcher and author David Icke has characterized in
his latest book, The Biggest Secret, as Problem, Reaction, and
The technique is as follows: NWO strategists
create the Problem - by funding , assembling, and training an
"opposition" group to stimulate turmoil in an established
political power (sovereign country, region, continent, etc.) that
they wish to impinge upon and thus create opposing factions in
a conflict that the NWO themselves maneuvered into existence.
In recent decades, so called opposition groups are usually identified
in the media as 'freedom fighters' or 'liberators'.
At the same time, the leader of the established
political power where the conflict is being orchestrated is demonized
and, on cue, referred to as 'another Hitler' (take your pick:
Saddam Hussein, Milosevic, Kadaffi, etc.). The 'freedom fighters'
are not infrequently assembled from a local criminal element (i.e.
KLA, drug traffickers). In the spirit of true Machiavellian deceit,
the same NWO strategists are equally involved in covertly arming
and advising the leader of the established power as well (the
NWO always profits from any armed conflict by loaning money, arming,
and supplying all parties involved in a war).
The conflict is drawn to the world stage
by the controlled media outlets with a barrage of photos and video
tape reports of horrific and bloody atrocities suffered by innocent
civilians. The cry goes up "Something has to be done!"
And that is the desired Reaction.
The NWO puppeteers then provide the Solution
by sending in UN 'Peace Keepers' (Bosnia) or a UN 'Coalition Force'
(Gulf War) or NATO Bombers and then ground troops (Kosovo), or
the military to 'search for Weapons of Mass Destruction', which
of course are never found. Once installed, the 'peace keepers'
never leave. The idea is to have NWO controlled ground troops
in all major countries or strategic areas where significant resistance
to the New World Order takeover is likely to be encountered.
Who is the NWO?
The corporate portion of the NWO is dominated
by international bankers, oil barons and pharmaceutical cartels,
as well as other major multinational corporations. The Royal Family
of England, namely Queen Elizabeth II and the House of Windsor,
(who are, in fact, descendants of the German arm of European Royalty
- the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family - changed the name to Windsor in
1914), are high level players in the oligarchy which controls
the upper strata of the NWO. The decision making nerve centers
of this effort are in London (especially the City of London),
Basel Switzerland, and Brussels (NATO headquarters).
The United Nations, along with all the
agencies working under the UN umbrella, such as the World Health
Organization (WHO), are full time players in this scheme. Similarly,
NATO is a military tool of the NWO.
The leaders of all major industrial countries
like the United States, England, Germany, Italy, Australia, New
Zealand, etc. (members of the "G7/G8" ) are active and
fully cooperative participants in this conspiracy. In this century,
the degree of control exerted by the NWO has advanced to the point
that only certain hand-picked individuals, who are groomed and
selected are even eligible to become the prime minister or president
of countries like England, Germany, or The United States. It didn't
matter whether Bill Clinton or Bob Dole won the Presidency in
1996, the results would have been the same. Both men are playing
on the same team for the same ball club. Anyone who isn't a team
player is taken out: i.e. President Kennedy, Ali Bhutto (Pakistan)
and Aldo Moro (Italy). More recently, Admiral Borda and William
Colby were also killed because they were either unwilling to go
along with the conspiracy to destroy America, weren't cooperating
in some capacity, or were attempting to expose/ thwart the takeover
The NWO's Role in Shaping History
Most of the major wars, political upheavals,
and economic depression/recessions of the past 100 years (and
earlier) were carefully planned and instigated by the machinations
of these elites. They include The Spanish-American War (1898),
World War I and World War II; The Great Depression; the Bolshevik
Revolution of 1917; the Rise of Nazi Germany; the Korean War;
the Vietnam War; the 1989-91 "fall" of Soviet Communism;
the 1991 Gulf War; the War in Kosovo; and the two Iraq wars. Even
the French Revolution was orchestrated into existence by elements
of the NWO.
The instigation of a trumped-up war as
a cover for amassing fortunes which can be dated back to at least
the 12th Century when only a core group of nine members of the
Knights Templar, kicked off the The Crusades that lasted for over
a century and a half.
The core group mentioned above have been
reported as being the military arm of a secret society known as
the Priory of Sion, but this has been proven to be a hoax,
In 1307, the king of France, Philippe
the Fair, coveted the wealth and was jealous of the Templars'
power. The French king set out to arrest all the Templars in France
on October 13. While many Templars were seized and tortured, including
their Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, many other Templars (who
had been tipped off) escaped. They eventually resurfaced in Portugal,
in Malta (as the Knights of Malta) and later in Scotland as The
Scottish Rites of Freemasonry, with Albert Pike playing a key
role in defining a plan for establishing a world government.
The acquisition and consolidation of ever
greater wealth, natural resources, total political power, and
control over others are the motivating forces which drive the
decisions of the NWO leaders. The toll in human suffering and
the loss of innocent lives are non issues for these individuals.
This article is extracted from an excellent
analysis of the New World Order by author Ken Adachi which can
be found at educate-yourself.org.
Significant Dates in the Creation of the
New World Order
Perhaps the best way to relate a brief
history of the New World Order, would be to use the words of those
who have been striving to make it real throughout the ages. You
will be amazed at how far back this grand plan has extended, and
how many similarities there are in early Century 21 compared to
the 1990's, with two Presidents from the Bush family in power.
1912 -- Colonel Edward M. House, a close
advisor of President Woodrow Wilson, publishes Phillip Dru: Administrator
in which he promotes "socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx."
1913 -- The Federal Reserve (neither federal
nor a reserve) is created. It was planned at a secret meeting
in 1910 on Jekyll Island, Georgia by a group of bankers and politicians,
including Col. House. This transferred the power to create money
from the American government to a private group of bankers. It
is probably the largest generator of debt in the world.
July 28, 1914 -- World War I is triggered
by the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand of Austria.
May 27, 1916 -- President Woodrow Wilson
proposes at the League of Nations in a speech before the League
to Enforce Peace, a world needed to prevent the recurrence of
a similar war was a world government.
November 11, 1918 -- The end of World
War I, after the signing of the Armistice at the 11th hour on
the 11th day of the 11th month.
May 30, 1919 -- Prominent British and
American personalities establish the Royal Institute of International
Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs
in the U.S. at a meeting arranged by Col. House attended by various
Fabian socialists, including noted economist John Maynard Keynes.
Two years later, Col. House reorganizes the Institute of International
Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
December 15, 1922 -- The CFR endorses
World Government in its magazine Foreign Affairs. Author Philip
"Obviously there is going to be no
peace or prosperity for mankind as long as [the earth] remains
divided into 50 or 60 independent states until some kind of international
system is created...The real problem today is that of the world
1928 -- The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints
for a World Revolution by H.G. Wells is published. A former Fabian
Socialist, Wells writes:
"The political world of the into
a Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede
existing governments... The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor
of socialist and communist enthusiasms; it may be in control of
Moscow before it is in control of New York... The character of
the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed... It will be
a world religion."
1931 -- Students at the Lenin School of
Political Warfare in Moscow are taught:
"One day we shall start to spread
the most theatrical peace movement the world has ever seen. The
capitalist countries, stupid and decadent...will fall into the
trap offered by the possibility of making new friends. Our day
will come in 30 years or so... The bourgeoisie must be lulled
into a false sense of security._
1932 -- New books are published urging
New World Order:
Toward Soviet America by William Z. Foster.
Head of the Communist Party USA, Foster indicates that a National
Department of Education would be one of the means used to develop
a new socialist society in the U.S.
The New World Order by F.S. Marvin, describing
the League of Nations as the first attempt at a New World Order.
Marvin says, "nationality must rank below the claims of mankind
as a whole."
Dare the School Build a New Social Order?
is published. Educator author George Counts asserts that:_"...the
teachers should deliberately reach for power and then make the
most of their conquest" in order to "influence the social
attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation...The
growth of science and technology has carried us into a new age
where ignorance must be replaced by knowledge, competition by
cooperation, trust in Providence by careful planning and private
capitalism by some form of social economy."
Plan for Peace by American Birth Control
League founder Margaret Sanger (1921) is published. She calls
for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative
concentration camps for all "dysgenic stocks" including
Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics.
1933 -- The first Humanist Manifesto is
published. Co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher and educator,
calls for a synthesizing of all religions and "a socialized
and cooperative economic order."
Co-signer C.F. Potter said in 1930: "Education
is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American public
school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools,
meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a fraction of the
children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic
1933 -- The Shape of Things to Come by
H.G. Wells is published. Wells predicts a second world war around
1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there
would be an increasing lack of public safety in "criminally
infected" areas. The plan for the "Modern World-State"
would succeed on its third attempt (about 1980), and come out
of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq.
The book also states, "Although world
government had been plainly coming for some years, although it
had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition
1934 -- The Externalization of the Hierarchy
by Alice A. Bailey is published. Bailey is an occultist, whose
works are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon
spirit] Djwahl Kuhl. Bailey uses the phrase "points of light"
in connection with a "New Group of World Servers" and
claims that 1934 marks the beginning of "the organizing of
the men and women...group work of a new order...[with] progress
defined by service...the world of the Brotherhood...the Forces
of Light...[and] out of the spoliation of all existing culture
and civilization, the new world order must be built."
The book is published by the Lucis Trust,
incorporated originally in New York as the Lucifer Publishing
Company. Lucis Trust is a United Nations NGO and has been a major
player at the recent U.N. summits. Later Assistant Secretary General
of the U.N. Robert Mueller would credit the creation of his World
Core Curriculum for education to the underlying teachings of Djwahl
Kuhl via Alice Bailey's writings on the subject.
October 28, 1939 -- In an address by John
Foster Dulles, later U.S. Secretary of State, he proposes that
America lead the transition to a new order of less independent,
semi-sovereign states bound together by a league or federal union.
1939 -- New World Order by H. G. Wells
proposes a collectivist one-world state"' or "new world
order" comprised of "socialist democracies." He
advocates "universal conscription for service" and declares
that "nationalist individualism...is the world's disease."
"The manifest necessity for some
collective world control to eliminate warfare and the less generally
admitted necessity for a collective control of the economic and
biological life of mankind, are aspects of one and the same process."
He proposes that this be accomplished through "universal
law" and propaganda (or education)."
1940 -- The New World Order is published
by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and contains
a select list of references on regional and world federation,
together with some special plans for world order after the war.
December 12, 1940 -- In The Congressional
Record an article entitled A New World Order John G. Alexander
calls for a world federation.
September 11, 1941 -- Construction officially
began at the Pentagon. 60 years later to the day, the Pentagon
was to be attacked on the fateful September 11, 2001.
1942 -- The leftist Institute of Pacific
Relations publishes Post War Worlds by P.E. Corbett:
"World government is the ultimate
aim...It must be recognized that the law of nations takes precedence
over national law...The process will have to be assisted by the
deletion of the nationalistic material employed in educational
textbooks and its replacement by material explaining the benefits
of wiser association."
June 28, 1945 -- President Truman endorses
world government in a speech:
"It will be just as easy for nations
to get along in a republic of the world as it is for us to get
along in a republic of the United States."
October 24, 1945 -- The United Nations
Charter becomes effective. Also on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor
(D-Idaho) introduces Senate Resolution 183 calling upon the U.S.
Senate to go on record as favoring creation of a world republic
including an international police force.
1946 -- Alger Hiss is elected President
of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Hiss holds
this office until 1949. Early in 1950, he is convicted of perjury
and sentenced to prison after a sensational trial and Congressional
hearing in which Whittaker Chambers, a former senior editor of
Time, testifies that Hiss was a member of his Communist Party
1946 -- The Teacher and World Government
by former editor of the NEA Journal (National Education Association)
Joy Elmer Morgan is published. He says:
"In the struggle to establish an
adequate world government, the teacher...can do much to prepare
the hearts and minds of children for global understanding and
cooperation...At the very heart of all the agencies which will
assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the
teacher, and the organized profession."
1947 -- The American Education Fellowship,
formerly the Progressive Education Association, organized by John
Dewey, calls for the:
"...establishment of a genuine world
order, an order in which national sovereignty is subordinate to
October, 1947 -- NEA Associate Secretary
William Carr writes in the NEA Journal that teachers should:
"...teach about the various proposals
that have been made for the strengthening of the United Nations
and the establishment of a world citizenship and world government."
1948 -- Walden II by behavioral psychologist
B.F. Skinner proposes "a perfect society or new and more
perfect order" in which children are reared by the State,
rather than by their parents and are trained from birth to demonstrate
only desirable behavior and characteristics. Skinner's ideas would
be widely implemented by educators in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s
as Values Clarification and Outcome Based Education.
July, 1948 -- Britain's Sir Harold Butler,
in the CFR's Foreign Affairs, sees "a New World Order"
"How far can the life of nations,
which for centuries have thought of themselves as distinct and
unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are
they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without
which there can be no effective economic or political union?...Out
of the prevailing confusion a new world is taking shape... which
may point the way toward the new order... That will be the beginning
of a real United Nations, no longer crippled by a split personality,
but held together by a common faith."
1948 -- UNESCO president and Fabian Socialist,
Sir Julian Huxley, calls for a radical eugenic policy in UNESCO:
Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. He states:
"Thus, even though it is quite true
that any radical eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will
be for many years politically and psychologically impossible,
it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem
is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is
informed of the issues at stake that much that is now unthinkable
may at least become thinkable."
1948 -- The preliminary draft of a World
Constitution is published by U.S. educators advocating regional
federation on the way toward world federation or government with
England incorporated into a European federation.
The Constitution provides for a "World
Council" along with a "Chamber of Guardians" to
enforce world law. Also included is a "Preamble" calling
upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government,
and includes the right of this "Federal Republic of the World"
to seize private property for federal use.
February 9, 1950 -- The Senate Foreign
Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution
66 which begins:
"Whereas, in order to achieve universal
peace and justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should
be changed to provide a true world government constitution."
The resolution was first introduced in
the Senate on September 13, 1949 by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho).
Senator Alexander Wiley (R-Wisconsin) called it "a consummation
devoutly to be wished for" and said, "I understand your
proposition is either change the United Nations, or change or
create, by a separate convention, a world order." Senator
Taylor later stated:
"We would have to sacrifice considerable
sovereignty to the world organization to enable them to levy taxes
in their own right to support themselves."
April 12, 1952 -- John Foster Dulles,
later to become Secretary of State, says in a speech to the American
Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky, that "treaty laws
can override the Constitution." He says treaties can take
power away from Congress and give them to the President. They
can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government
or to some international body and they can cut across the rights
given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights.
A Senate amendment, proposed by GOP Senator
John Bricker, would have provided that no treaty could supersede
the Constitution, but it fails to pass by one vote.
1954 -- Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands
establishes the Bilderbergers, international politicians and bankers
who meet secretly on an annual basis, even to this day. The 2003
meeting took place over the weekend of 15 to 18 May in Versailles,
1958 -- World Peace through World Law
is published, where authors Grenville Clark and Louis Sohn advocate
using the U.N. as a governing body for the world, world disarmament,
a world police force and legislature.
1959 -- The Council on Foreign Relations
calls for a New International Order. Study Number 7, issued on
November 25, advocated:
"...new international order [which]
must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, for social
and economic change...an international order...including states
labeling themselves as 'socialist' [communist]."
1959 -- The World Constitution and Parliament
Association is founded which later develops a Diagram of World
Government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.
1959 -- The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S.
Foreign Policy is published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers'
Fund. It explains that the U.S.:
"...cannot escape, and indeed should
welcome...the task which history has imposed on us. This is the
task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions
-- spiritual, economic, political, social."
September 9, 1960 -- President Eisenhower
signs Senate Joint Resolution 170, promoting the concept of a
federal Atlantic Union. Pollster and Atlantic Union Committee
treasurer, Elmo Roper, later delivers an address titled, The Goal
Is Government of All the World, in which he states:
"For it becomes clear that the first
step toward World Government cannot be completed until we have
advanced on the four fronts: the economic, the military, the political
and the social."
1961 -- The U.S. State Department issues
a plan to disarm all nations and arm the United Nations. State
Department Document Number 7277 is entitled Freedom From War:
The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful
World. It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and
arm the U.N. with the final stage in which "no state would
have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened
U.N. Peace Force."
1962 -- New Calls for World Federalism.
In a study titled, A World Effectively Controlled by the United
Nations, CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield states:
"...if the communist dynamic was
greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has
for world government."
The Future of Federalism by author Nelson
Rockefeller is published. The one-time Governor of New York, claims
that current events compellingly demand a "new world order,"
as the old order is crumbling, and there is "a new and free
order struggling to be born." Rockefeller says there is:
"a fever of nationalism...[but] the
nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its
international political tasks....These are some of the reasons
pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new
world order... [with] voluntary service...and our dedicated faith
in the brotherhood of all mankind....Sooner perhaps than we may
realize...there will evolve the bases for a federal structure
of the free world."
1963 -- J. William Fulbright, Chairman
of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee speaks at a symposium
sponsored by the Fund for the Republic, a left-wing project of
the Ford Foundation:
"The case for government by elites
is irrefutable...government by the people is possible but highly
November 22, 1963 -- President Kennedy
is assassinated on November 22, 1963. He was killed according
to the occult number signature of eleven . He was killed in
the 11th month, on the 22nd day, and on the 33rd parallel. He
was also killed in the Masonic Dealey Plaza, the most powerful
secret society in the world today to whom the number 11 is extremely
important. See cuttingedge for details.
1964 -- Taxonomy of Educational Objectives,
Handbook II is published. Author Benjamin Bloom states:
"...a large part of what we call
'good teaching' is the teacher's ability to attain affective objectives
through challenging the students' fixed beliefs."
His Outcome-Based Education (OBE) method
of teaching would first be tried as Mastery Learning in Chicago
schools. After five years, Chicago students' test scores had plummeted
causing outrage among parents. OBE would leave a trail of wreckage
wherever it would be tried and under whatever name it would be
used. At the same time, it would become crucial to globalists
for overhauling the education system to promote attitude changes
among school students.
1964 -- Visions of Order by Richard Weaver
is published. He describes:
"progressive educators as a 'revolutionary
cabal' engaged in 'a systematic attempt to undermine society's
traditions and beliefs.'"
1967 -- Richard Nixon calls for New World
Order. In Asia after Vietnam, in the October issue of Foreign
Affairs, Nixon writes of nations' dispositions to evolve regional
approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a "new
1968 -- Joy Elmer Morgan, former editor
of the NEA Journal publishes The American Citizens Handbook in
which he says:
"the coming of the United Nations
and the urgent necessity that it evolve into a more comprehensive
form of world government places upon the citizens of the United
States an increased obligation to make the most of their citizenship
which now widens into active world citizenship."
July 26, 1968 -- Nelson Rockefeller pledges
support of the New World Order. In an Associated Press report,
Rockefeller pledges that, "as President, he would work toward
international creation of a new world order."
1970 -- Education and the mass media promote
world order. In Thinking About A New World Order for the Decade
1990, author Ian Baldwin, Jr. asserts that:
"...the World Law Fund has begun
a worldwide research and educational program that will introduce
a new, emerging discipline -- world order -- into educational
curricula throughout the world...and to concentrate some of its
energies on bringing basic world order concepts into the mass
media again on a worldwide level."
1972 -- President Nixon visits China.
In his toast to Chinese Premier Chou En-lai, former CFR member
and now President, Richard Nixon, expresses "the hope that
each of us has to build a new world order."
May 18, 1972 -- In speaking of the coming
of world government, Roy M. Ash, director of the Office of Management
and Budget, declares that:
"within two decades the institutional
framework for a world economic community will be in place...[and]
aspects of individual sovereignty will be given over to a supernational
September 11, 1972 -- The world was introduced
to terrorism at the 1972 Munich Olympic Games. There were 11 Israeli
athletes killed. Exactly 29 years after this attack, another more
despicable horror occurred - the September 11, 2001 terrorist
1973 -- The Trilateral Commission is established.
Banker David Rockefeller organizes this new private body and chooses
Zbigniew Brzezinski, later National Security Advisor to President
Carter, as the Commission's first director and invites Jimmy Carter
to become a founding member.
1973 -- Humanist Manifesto II is published:
"The next century can be and should
be the humanistic century...we stand at the dawn of a new age...a
secular society on a planetary scale....As non-theists we begin
with humans not God, nature not deity...we deplore the division
of humankind on nationalistic grounds....Thus we look to the development
of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational
federal government....The true revolution is occurring."
September 11, 1973 -- Chilean President
Salvador Allende is killed in a brutal, violent military coup
led by General Augusto Pinochet. Henry Kissinger was strongly
implicated in this attack, and if he were to ever stand trial
in an International Court, it is likely he would be charged with
masterminding this coup and ordering the assassination of Allende.
April, 1974 -- Former U. S. Deputy Assistant
Secretary of State, Trilateralist and CFR member Richard Gardner's
article The Hard Road to World Order is published in the CFR's
Foreign Affairs where he states that:
"the 'house of world order' will
have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but
an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece,
will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."
1974 -- The World Conference of Religion
for Peace, held in Louvain, Belgium is held. Douglas Roche presents
a report entitled We Can Achieve a New World Order.
The U.N. calls for wealth redistribution:
In a report entitled New International Economic Order, the U.N.
General Assembly outlines a plan to redistribute the wealth from
the rich to the poor nations.
1975 -- A study titled, A New World Order,
is published by the Center of International Studies, Woodrow Wilson
School of Public and International Studies, Princeton University.
1975 -- In Congress, 32 Senators and 92
Representatives sign A Declaration of Interdependence, written
by historian Henry Steele Commager. The Declaration states that:
"we must join with others to bring
forth a new world order... Narrow notions of national sovereignty
must not be permitted to curtail that obligation."
Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to
sign the Declaration saying:
"It calls for the surrender of our
national sovereignty to international organizations. It declares
that our economy should be regulated by international authorities.
It proposes that we enter a 'new world order' that would redistribute
the wealth created by the American people."
1975 -- Retired Navy Admiral Chester Ward,
former Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy and former CFR
member, writes in a critique that the goal of the CFR is the "submergence
of U. S. sovereignty and national independence into an all powerful
1975 -- Kissinger on the Couch is published.
Authors Phyllis Schlafly and former CFR member Chester Ward state:
"Once the ruling members of the CFR
have decided that the U.S. government should espouse a particular
policy, the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are
put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional,
to support the new policy and to confound, discredit, intellectually
and politically, any opposition..."
1976 -- RIO: Reshaping the International
Order is published by the globalist Club of Rome, calling for
a new international order, including an economic redistribution
1977 -- The Third Try at World Order is
published. Author Harlan Cleveland of the Aspen Institute for
Humanistic Studies calls for:
"changing Americans' attitudes and
institutions" for "complete disarmament (except for
international soldiers)" and "for individual entitlement
to food, health and education."
[Sound like America today?]
1977 -- Imperial Brain Trust by Laurence
Shoup and William Minter is published. The book takes a critical
look at the Council on Foreign Relations with chapters such as:
Shaping a New World Order: The Council's Blueprint for Global
Hegemony, 1939-1944 and Toward the 1980's: The Council's Plans
for a New World Order.
1977 -- The Trilateral Connection appears
in the July edition of Atlantic Monthly. Written by Jeremiah Novak,
"For the third time in this century,
a group of American schools, businessmen, and government officials
is planning to fashion a New World Order..."
1977 -- Leading educator Mortimer Adler
publishes Philosopher at Large in which he says:
"...if local civil government is
necessary for local civil peace, then world civil government is
necessary for world peace."
1979 -- Barry Goldwater, retiring Republican
Senator from Arizona, publishes his autobiography With No Apologies.
"In my view The Trilateral Commission
represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and
consolidate the four centers of power -- political, monetary,
intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the
interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community.
What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide
economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states
involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to
create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators
of the system they will rule the future."
1984 -- The Power to Lead is published.
Author James McGregor Burns admits:
"The framers of the U.S. constitution
have simply been too shrewd for us. The have outwitted us. They
designed separate institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical
linkages, frail bridges, tinkering. If we are to 'turn the Founders
upside down' -- we must directly confront the constitutional structure
1985 -- Norman Cousins, the honorary chairman
of Planetary Citizens for the World We Chose, is quoted in Human
"World government is coming, in fact,
it is inevitable. No arguments for or against it can change that
Cousins was also president of the World
Federalist Association, an affiliate of the World Association
for World Federation (WAWF), headquartered in Amsterdam. WAWF
is a leading force for world federal government and is accredited
by the U.N. as a Non-Governmental Organization.
1987 -- The Secret Constitution and the
Need for Constitutional Change is sponsored in part by the Rockefeller
Foundation. Some thoughts of author Arthur S. Miller are:
"...a pervasive system of thought
control exists in the United States...the citizenry is indoctrinated
by employment of the mass media and the system of public education...people
are told what to think about...the old order is crumbling... Nationalism
should be seen as a dangerous social disease...A new vision is
required to plan and manage the future, a global vision that will
transcend national boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic
solutions...a new Constitution is necessary."
1988 -- Former Under-secretary of State
and CFR member George Ball in a January 24 interview in the New
York Times says:
"The Cold War should no longer be
the kind of obsessive concern that it is. Neither side is going
to attack the other deliberately...If we could internationalize
by using the U.N. in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because
we now no longer have to fear, in most cases, a Soviet veto, then
we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get
the U.N. back to doing something useful...Sooner or later we are
going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they
are not confined merely to the nation-states. Start first on a
regional and ultimately you could move to a world basis."
December 7, 1988 -- In an address to the
U.N., Mikhail Gorbachev calls for mutual consensus:
"World progress is only possible
through a search for universal human consensus as we move forward
to a new world order."
May 12, 1989 -- President Bush invites
the Soviets to join World Order. Speaking to the graduating class
at Texas A&M University, Mr. Bush states that the United States
is ready to welcome the Soviet Union "back into the world
1989 -- Carl Bernstein's (Woodward and
Bernstein of Watergate fame) book Loyalties: A Son's Memoir is
published. His father and mother had been members of the Communist
party. Bernstein's father tells his son about the book:
"You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph]
McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system
was loaded with Communists. And he was right...I'm worried about
the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy.
The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying
he was right...I agree that the Party was a force in the country."
November 9, 1989 -- The much hated Berlin
Wall comes tumbling down, completing the deliberate dissolution
of the U.S.S.R. and of Communism.
1990 -- The World Federalist Association
faults the American press. Writing in their Summer/Fall newsletter,
Deputy Director Eric Cox describes world events over the past
year or two and declares:
"It's sad but true that the slow-witted
American press has not grasped the significance of most of these
developments. But most federalists know what is happening...And
they are not frightened by the old bug-a-boo of sovereignty."
April 11, 1990 -- Russian President Gorbachev
announced Russia would join New World Order.
August 2, 1990 -- Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.
August 17, 1990 -- President Bush [Senior]
announces that the Iraqi invasion "shall not stand, because
it threatens the New World Order".
September 11, 1990 -- President Bush calls
the Gulf War an opportunity for the New World Order. In an address
to Congress entitled Toward a New World Order, Mr. Bush says:
"The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers
a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation.
Out of these troubled times... a new world order can emerge in
which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south,
can prosper and live in harmony.... Today the new world is struggling
to be born."
September 25, 1990 -- In an address to
the U.N., Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze describes
Iraq's invasion of Kuwait as "an act of terrorism [that]
has been perpetrated against the emerging New World Order."
On December 31, Gorbachev declares that the New World Order would
be ushered in by the Gulf Crisis.
October 1, 1990 -- In a U.N. address,
President Bush speaks of the:
"...collective strength of the world
community expressed by the U.N...an historic movement towards
a new world order... a new partnership of nations... a time when
humankind came into its own... to bring about a revolution of
the spirit and the mind and begin a journey into a... new age."
1991 -- Author Linda MacRae-Campbell publishes
How to Start a Revolution at Your School in In Context. She promotes
the use of "change agents" as "self-acknowledged
revolutionaries" and "co-conspirators."
1991 -- President Bush praises the New
World Order in a State of Union Message:
"What is at stake is more than one
small country, it is a big idea -- a new world order... to achieve
the universal aspirations of mankind... based on shared principles
and the rule of law.... The illumination of a thousand points
of light.... The winds of change are with us now."
February 6, 1991 -- President Bush tells
the Economic Club of New York:
"My vision of a new world order foresees
a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function."
June, 1991 -- The Council on Foreign Relations
co-sponsors an assembly Rethinking America's Security: Beyond
Cold War to New World Order which is attended by 65 prestigious
members of government, labor, academia, the media, military, and
the professions from nine countries. Later, several of the conference
participants joined some 100 other world leaders for another closed
door meeting of the Bilderberg Society in Baden Baden, Germany.
The Bilderbergers also exert considerable clout in determining
the foreign policies of their respective governments.
July, 1991 -- The Southeastern World Affairs
Institute discusses the New World Order. In a program, topics
include, Legal Structures for a New World Order and The United
Nations: From its Conception to a New World Order. Participants
include a former director of the U.N.'s General Legal Division,
and a former Secretary General of International Planned Parenthood.
Late July, 1991 -- On a Cable News Network
program, CFR member and former CIA director Stansfield Turner
(Rhodes scholar), when asked about Iraq, responded:
"We have a much bigger objective.
We've got to look at the long run here. This is an example --
the situation between the United Nations and Iraq -- where the
United Nations is deliberately intruding into the sovereignty
of a sovereign nation...Now this is a marvelous precedent (to
be used in) all countries of the world..."
October 29, 1991 -- David Funderburk,
former U. S. Ambassador to Romania, tells a North Carolina audience:
"George Bush has been surrounding
himself with people who believe in one-world government. They
believe that the Soviet system and the American system are converging."
The vehicle to bring this about, said
Funderburk, is the United Nations, "the majority of whose
166 member states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American."
Funderburk served as ambassador in Bucharest from 1981 to 1985,
when he resigned in frustration over U.S. support of the oppressive
regime of the late Rumanian dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu.
October 30, 1991: -- President Gorbachev
at the Middle East Peace Talks in Madrid states:
"We are beginning to see practical
support. And this is a very significant sign of the movement towards
a new era, a new age... We see both in our country and elsewhere...ghosts
of the old thinking...When we rid ourselves of their presence,
we will be better able to move toward a new world order... relying
on the relevant mechanisms of the United Nations."
Elsewhere, in Alexandria, Virginia, Elena
Lenskaya, Counsellor to the Minister of Education of Russia, delivers
the keynote address for a program titled, Education for a New
1992 -- The Twilight of Sovereignty by
CFR member (and former Citicorp Chairman) Walter Wriston is published,
in which he claims:
"A truly global economy will require
...compromises of national sovereignty... There is no escaping
1992 -- The United Nations Conference
on Environment and Development (UNCED) Earth Summit takes place
in Rio de Janeiro this year, headed by Conference Secretary-General
Maurice Strong. The main products of this summit are the Biodiversity
Treaty and Agenda 21, which the U.S. hesitates to sign because
of opposition at home due to the threat to sovereignty and economics.
The summit says the first world's wealth must be transferred to
the third world.
July 20, 1992 -- TIME magazine publishes
The Birth of the Global Nation by Strobe Talbott, Rhodes Scholar,
roommate of Bill Clinton at Oxford University, CFR Director, and
Trilateralist, in which he writes:
"All countries are basically social
arrangements... No matter how permanent or even sacred they may
seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary...
Perhaps national sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all...
But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century
to clinch the case for world government."
As an editor of Time, Talbott defended
Clinton during his presidential campaign. He was appointed by
President Clinton as the number two person at the State Department
behind Secretary of State Warren Christopher, former Trilateralist
and former CFR Vice-Chairman and Director. Talbott was confirmed
by about two-thirds of the U.S. Senate despite his statement about
the unimportance of national sovereignty.
September 29, 1992 -- At a town hall meeting
in Los Angeles, Trilateralist and former CFR president Winston
Lord delivers a speech titled Changing Our Ways: America and the
New World, in which he remarks:
"To a certain extent, we are going
to have to yield some of our sovereignty, which will be controversial
at home... [Under] the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)...
some Americans are going to be hurt as low-wage jobs are taken
Lord became an Assistant Secretary of
State in the Clinton administration.
Winter, 1992-93 -- The CFR's Foreign Affairs
publishes Empowering the United Nations by U.N. Secretary General
Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who asserts:
"It is undeniable that the centuries-old
doctrine of absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands...
Underlying the rights of the individual and the rights of peoples
is a dimension of universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity...
It is a sense that increasingly finds expression in the gradual
expansion of international law... In this setting the significance
of the United Nations should be evident and accepted."
December 31, 1992 -- Formation of Western
Europe as the first nation to be formed in the global 10-Nation
1993 -- Strobe Talbott receives the Norman
Cousins Global Governance Award for his 1992 TIME article, The
Birth of the Global Nation and in appreciation for what he has
done "for the cause of global governance." President
Clinton writes a letter of congratulation which states:
"Norman Cousins worked for world
peace and world government... Strobe Talbott's lifetime achievements
as a voice for global harmony have earned him this recognition...
He will be a worthy recipient of the Norman Cousins Global Governance
Award. Best wishes... for future success."
Not only does President Clinton use the
specific term, "world government," but he also expressly
wishes the WFA "future success" in pursuing world federal
government. Talbott proudly accepts the award, but says the WFA
should have given it to the other nominee, Mikhail Gorbachev.
April 19, 1993 -- Waco conflagration.
July 18, 1993 -- CFR member and Trilateralist
Henry Kissinger writes in the Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA:
"What Congress will have before it
is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of
a new international system... a first step toward a new world
August 23, 1993 -- Christopher Hitchens,
Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he was at Oxford University,
says in a C-Span interview:
"...it is, of course the case that
there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has allies
October 30, 1993 -- Washington Post ombudsman
Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece about the role of the CFR's
"Their membership is an acknowledgment
of their ascension into the American ruling class [where] they
do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United
States; they help make it."
January/February, 1994 -- The CFR's Foreign
Affairs prints an opening article by CFR Senior Fellow Michael
Clough in which he writes that the "Wise Men" (e.g.
Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have:
"assiduously guarded it [American
foreign policy] for the past 50 years...They ascended to power
during World War II...This was as it should be. National security
and the national interest, they argued must transcend the special
interests and passions of the people who make up America... How
was this small band of Atlantic-minded internationalists able
to triumph?... Eastern internationalists were able to shape and
staff the burgeoning foreign policy institutions... As long as
the Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed only a missile
away, the public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic
foreign policy making system."
1995 -- The State of the World Forum took
place in the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation
located at the Presidio in San Francisco. Foundation President
Jim Garrison chairs the meeting of who's-whos from around the
world including Margaret Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush,
Mikhail Gorbachev and others. Conversation centers around the
oneness of mankind and the coming global government. However,
the term "global governance" is now used in place of
"new world order" since the latter has become a political
liability, being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.
April 19, 1995 -- Oklahoma City bombing
of the Federal Murrah Building.
1996 -- The United Nations 420-page report
Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a plan for "global
governance," calling for an international Conference on Global
Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world
the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the
1996 -- State of the World Forum II takes
place in the fall in San Francisco. Many of the sessions are closed
to the press.
December 31, 1999 -- Washington Monument
sprays colored light into the black night sky, symbolizing the
'impregnation' of the New World Order.
September 10, 2000 -- The conclusion of
a 13-day summit -- August 28 - September 10, 2000 -- which officially
gave birth to the New World Order, which was 'conceived' 9 months
earlier at the Washington Obelisk in DC. See cuttingedge.org for
September 11, 2001 -- Eleven years to
the day after President Bush [Senior] delivers his speech to Congress
entitled Toward a New World Order, and 1 year and 1 day after
the official birth of the New World Order, "terrorists"
attack and destroy the World Trade Center and severely damage
Interestingly, the date could also have
been chosen to celebrate the birth of The Knights Templar, formed
by 9 European separatists who forbade new members for 9 years
in 1111 AD.
September 12, 2001 -- "There is a
chance for the President of the United States to use this disaster
to carry out what his father - a phrase his father used I think
only once, and it hasn't been used since - and that is a new world
order." - Senator Gary Hart, Council on Foreign Relations
September 13, 2001 -- Deputy Defense Secretary
Paul Wolfowitz says the retaliation [re: Sept 11] would be continued
until the roots of terrorism are destroyed. "These people
try to hide. They won't be able to hide forever ... They think
their harbors are safe, but they won't be safe forever ... it's
not simply a matter of capturing people and holding them accountable,
but removing the sanctuaries, removing the support systems, ending
states who sponsor terrorism."
October 11, 2001 -- Tom Brokaw (popular
US news anchor) announces the world now has formed into the New
October 26, 2001 -- President Bush signs
legislation into law that gives Federal Government dictatorial
powers and severely -- if not fatally -- erodes individual liberties
January 29, 2002 -- Bush, in his State
of the Union Address, lists Iraq, Iran and North Korea as constituting
an 'axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By
seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave
and growing danger'.
September 12, 2002 -- Bush tells UN that
Iraq is a "grave and gathering danger" and that the
US "will not allow any terrorist or tyrant to threaten civilization
with weapons of mass murder".
February 01, 2003 -- Space shuttle Columbia
breaks up on re-entry over Dallas, Texas.
February 2003 -- First reported cases
of SARS. A massive media blitz attempts to create a pandemic,
but by May 2003, only 600 people worldwide have died. Compared
to the Influenza Pandemic of 1917-1919 which killed 800,000 Americans
and 25 million people worldwide, SARS is hardly a pandemic.
March 17, 2003 -- At 8:15pm, EST, President
Bush announces a 48-hour ultimatum to Saddam Hussein to leave
the country with his sons, or suffer the invasion.
March 20, 2003 -- US starts invasion of
Iraq, exactly 555 days after September 11, 2001. The start of
World War III?
February 14, 2006 -- Bill is introduced
in the United States House of Representatives to reinstate compulsory
May 19, 2006 -- Bush considering creating
a North American Union. Will this replace the United States?
What Really Caused World War 1?
The True Cause of World War 1
History books record that World War I
started when the nations went to war to avenge the assassination
of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand, the heir to the Habsburg throne,
on June 28, 1914.
This is the typical explanation. But the
"revisionist historian" knows just what caused and what
the purpose was of the conflagration of World War I.
Up until America's entry into this war,
the American people had followed the wise advice of President
George Washington given in his farewell address, delivered to
the nation on September 17, 1796. President Washington said: "It
is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any
portion of the foreign world.... Why, by interweaving our destiny
with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity
in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humour
President Washington attempted to warn
the American people about getting embroiled in the affairs of
Europe. But in 1914, it was not to be. There were those who were
secretly planning America's involvement in World War I whether
the American people wanted it or not.
The Plan to Involve America in World War
The pressure to involve the American government
started in 1909, long before the actual assassination of the Archduke.
Norman Dodd, former director of the Committee
to Investigate Tax Exempt Foundations of the U.S. House of Representatives,
testified that the Committee was invited to study the minutes
of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace as part of the
Committee's investigation. The Committee stated: "The trustees
of the Foundation brought up a single question. If it is desirable
to alter the life of an entire people, is there any means more
efficient than war.... They discussed this question... for a year
and came up with an answer: There are no known means more efficient
than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire
people. That leads them to a question: How do we involve the United
States in a war. This is in 1909."
So the decision was made to involve the
United States in a war so that the "life of the entire people
could be altered." This was the conclusion of a foundation
supposedly committed to "peace."
The method by which the United States
was drawn into the war started on October 25, 1911, when Winston
Churchill was appointed the First Lord of the Admiralty in England.
Winston Churchill is an interesting individual,
as he later came to the conclusion that there was indeed a master
conspiracy at work in the major events of the world, when he wrote
the following in 1920: "From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt
to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky (Russia)... this world-wide
conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization... has been steadily
The second key appointment made during
the pre-war period was the appointment of Franklin Delano Roosevelt
as Assistant Secretary of the Navy by President Woodrow Wilson.
Roosevelt is also on record as concluding
that there was a conspiracy, at least in the United States. He
once wrote to Colonel Edward Mandell House: "The real truth
of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element
in the larger centers has owned the government ever since the
days of Andrew Jackson, and I am not wholly excepting the administration
of W.W. (Woodrow Wilson.) The country is going through a repetition
of Jackson's fight with the Bank of the United States-only on
a far bigger and broader basis."
The Sinking of the Lusitania
The next step in the maneuvering of the
United States into the war came when the Cunard Lines, owner of
the ocean liner, the Lusitania, turned the ship over to the First
Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill. It now became a ship
of the English Navy and was under the control of the English government.
The ship was sent to New York City where
it was loaded with six million rounds of ammunition, owned by
J.P. Morgan & Co., to be sold to England and France to aid
in their war against Germany.
It was known that the very wealthy were
interested in involving the American government in that war, and
Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan was one who made note
of this. "As Secretary [Bryan] had anticipated, the large
banking interests were deeply interested in the World War because
of wide opportunities for large profits. On August 3, 1914, even
before the actual clash of arms, the French firm of Rothschild
Freres cabled to Morgan and Company in New York suggesting the
flotation of a loan of $100,000,000, a substantial part of which
was to be left in the United States, to pay for French purchases
of American goods."
England broke the German war code on December
14, 1914, so that "By the end of January, 1915, [British
Intelligence was] able to advise the Admiralty of the departure
of each U-boat as it left for patrol...."
This meant that the First Lord of the
Admiralty, Winston Churchill, knew where every U-boat was in the
vicinity of the English Channel that separated England and France.
The ocean liner was set to sail to England
already at war with Germany. The German government had placed
advertisements in the New York newspapers warning the American
people considering whether or not to sail with the ship to England
that they would be sailing into a war zone, and that the liner
could be sunk.
Secretary Bryan promised that "he
would endeavor to persuade the President (Woodrow Wilson) publicly
to warn the Americans not to travel [aboard the Lusitania]. No
such warning was issued by the President, but there can be no
doubt that President Wilson was told of the character of the cargo
destined for the Lusitania. He did nothing... ."
Even though Wilson proclaimed America's
neutrality in the European War, in accordance with the prior admonitions
of George Washington, his government was secretly plotting to
involve the American people by having the Lusitania sunk. This
was made public in the book The Intimate Papers of Colonel House,
written by a supporter of the Colonel, who recorded a conversation
between Colonel House and Sir Edward Grey of England, the Foreign
Secretary of England:
Grey: What will America do if the Germans
sink an ocean liner with American passengers on board?
House: I believe that a flame of indignation
would sweep the United States and that by itself would be sufficient
to carry us into the war.
On May 7, 1915, the Lusitania was sunk
off the coast of County Cork, Ireland by a U-boat after it had
slowed to await the arrival of the English escort vessel, the
Juno, which was intended to escort it into the English port. The
First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, issued orders
that the Juno was to return to port, and the Lusitania sat alone
in the channel. Because Churchill knew of the presence of three
U-boats in the vicinity, it is reasonable to presume that he had
planned for the Lusitania to be sunk, and it was. 1201 people
lost their lives in the sinking.
This sinking has been described by Colin
Simpson, the author of a book entitled The Lusitania, as "the
foulest act of wilful murder ever committed on the seas."
But the event was not enough to enable
President Wilson to declare war against the German government,
and the conspirators changed tactics. They would use other means
to get the American people involved in the war, as the "flame
of indignation" did not sweep the United States as had been
Robert Lansing, the Assistant Secretary
of State, is on record as stating: "We must educate the public
gradually - draw it along to the point where it will be willing
to go into the war."
After the sinking of the Lusitania, two
inquiries were held, one by the English government, in June, 1915,
and one by the American government in 1918. Mr. Simpson has written
that "Both sets of archives... contain meager information.
There are substantial differences of fact in the two sets of papers
and in many cases it is difficult to accept that the files relate
to the same vessel."
But in both inquiries, the conclusions
were the same: torpedoes and not exploding ammunition sank the
Lusitania, because there was no ammunition aboard. The cover-up
was now official.
But there have been critics of these inquiries.
One was, of course, the book written by Colin Simpson, who did
the research necessary to write his book in the original minutes
of the two inquiries.
The Los Angeles Times reviewed Mr. Simpson's
book and concluded: "The Lusitania proves beyond a reasonable
doubt that the British government connived at the sinking of the
passenger ship in order to lure America into World War I. The
Germans, whose torpedo struck the liner, were the unwitting accomplices
or victims of a plot probably concocted by Winston Churchill."
President Wilson was seeking re-election
in 1916. He campaigned on his record of "keeping us out of
the War" during his first term of office from 1912 to 1916.
The Real Reason for World War 1
But behind the scenes, Wilson was secretly
plotting America's entry into the War, mainly through the machinations
of Wilson's major advisor, Colonel Edward Mandell House. House
had already committed America to a participation in the war: "The
House-Grey memorandum... pledged American intervention on the
side of the Allies if Germany would not come promptly to the peace
table. This agreement was approved by Wilson eight months before
the 1916 election."
But the real reason the War was being
fought was slowly emerging. One of the first revelations occurred
on May 27, 1916, when President Wilson urged the creation of the
League of Nations in a speech entitled League to Enforce Peace.
Wilson argued that what the world needed to prevent the recurrence
of a similar war was a world government.
Some were not happy with the slowness
of America's entry into the war. One of these was Franklin Roosevelt,
In the early months of 1917 [before the
official declaration of war by the United States government] he
had been in constant conflict with his chief, Secretary of the
Navy, Joseph Daniels, over the same issues.
For Daniels, who resisted every move that
might carry the United States into the war, those four months
(January through April) of 1917 were the "agony of Gethsemane."
He opposed convoying [the intentional
sending of American ships into the war zone in the hope that one
would be sunk by the German Navy]. He opposed the arming of merchant
ships [intentionally provoking the German Navy into believing
that the ship was a ship of war].
Roosevelt favored both.
And when a filibuster prevented congressional
authorization of the arming of merchantmen, Roosevelt was impatient
with Wilson for not immediately using his executive power to arm
[the ships]. He dined at the Metropolitan Club with a group of
Republican "warhawks" [Roosevelt was a Democrat]. It
included Theodore Roosevelt, General Wood, J.P. Morgan, and Elihu
Root [one of the founders of the CFR].
The primary topic of discussion was, according
to Roosevelt's diary, "how to make Administration steer a
dear course to uphold rights."
This was an euphemism for an aggressive
policy on the high seas that would result in indents and involve
the United States in the war.
Roosevelt's badgering apparently paid
off, for on April 2, 1917, President Wilson asked Congress for
a Declaration of War, and it was granted on April 6. The United
States was now in the war "to end all wars," and "to
make the world safe for democracy."
The war wound its horrible course through
the destruction of human lives and ended on November 11, 1918.
Historian Walter Millis wrote the following
about the purpose of the war and about House's basic intent: "The
Colonel's sole justification for preparing such a batch of blood
for his countrymen was his hope of establishing a new world order
[a world government] of peace and security...."
The Outrageous Treaty of Versailles
The official treaty that ended the war
was the Treaty of Versailles, where representatives of all sides
sat down at a conference table and wrote the treaty.
Several interesting personalities attended
these meetings. In the British delegation was the British economist
John Maynard Keynes, and representing the American banking interests
was Paul Warburg, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve. His brother.
Max, the head of the German banking firm of M.M. Warburg and Company,
of Hamburg, Germany, and who "was not only in charge of Germany's
finances but was a leader of the German espionage system"
was there as a representative of the German government.
The Treaty was written to end the war,
but another delegate to the conference. Lord Curzon of England,
the British Foreign Secretary, saw through what the actual intent
was and declared: "This is no peace; this is only a truce
for twenty years." Lord Curzon felt that the terms of the
Treaty were setting the stage for a second world war, and he correctly
predicted the year it would start: 1939.
Lord Curzon was indeed a prophet: he picked
the actual year that World War II would start!
One of the planks of the Treaty called
for large amounts of war reparations to be paid to the victorious
nations by the German government. This plank of the Treaty alone
caused more grief in the German nation than any other and precipitated
0. The "hyperinflation" of the
German mark between 1920 and 1923;
0. The destruction of the middle class in Germany; and
0. The bringing to power of someone who could end the inflation:
a dictator like Adolf Hitler.
This plank was written by John Foster Dulles, one of the founders
of the Council on Foreign Relations, and later the Secretary of
State to President Dwight Eisenhower.
Even John Maynard Keynes became concerned
about the Treaty. He wrote: "The peace is outrageous and
impossible and can bring nothing but misfortune behind it".
In addition to writing the Treaty of Versailles,
the nations who were victorious in the war also wrote the Charter
of the League of Nations, which was ratified on January 10, 1920,
and signed by President Wilson for the American government. Wilson
brought the treaty back to the United States and asked the Senate
to ratify it The Senate, remembering George Washington's advice
to avoid foreign entanglements and reflecting the views of the
American people who did not wish to enter the League, refused
to ratify the treaty. President Wilson was not pleased, possibly
because he saw himself, as Senator Henry Cabot Lodge was quick
to point out, as: "... a future President of the world."
It is now apparent that Wilson intended
to head up the world government the war was fought to give the
world, and he became depressed when the Treaty was not ratified.
Imagine the disappointment of one who had come so close to becoming
the very first President of the World, only to have it taken away
by the actions of the Senate of the United States. Imagine the
sense of incredible power that Wilson must have felt, thinking
he would become the very first individual in the history of mankind
to rule the world. Others had tried and failed, but Wilson was
confident that he would succeed.
But the American people, expressing their
displeasure through the Senate, would not let him.
The Rich Get Richer
Others were not so disappointed, however.
"The war, in brief, provided an unparalleled opportunity
for the richest families to grab [exorbitant profits] at the expense
of the public and, without exception, they made the most of this
opportunity. The rich families, to be sure, wanted the war to
be won, but they took care that the victory was expensive to the
common taxpayers. They uttered no cries for government economy...
so long as the public treasury was at their disposal."
One of the families who reaped the exorbitant
profits were "the Rockefellers, who were very eager for the
United States to enter World War I, [and who] made far more than
$200,000,000 from that conflict."
But support for the League of Nations
continued. The Grand Orient Lodge of Freemasonry of France was
one which advised all of its members: "It is the duty of
universal Freemasonry to give its full support to the League of
As could have been anticipated, the League
of Nations became a major issue during the Presidential election
The Republican candidate Warren G. Harding
was on record as opposing the League and further attempts to ratify
the charter: "It will avail nothing to discuss in detail
the League covenant, which was conceived for world super-government
In the existing League of Nations, world governing with its super-powers,
this Republic will have no part."
He was opposed in the Republican primaries
by General Leonard Wood, one of the Republican "warhawks,"
who was ".. .backed by a powerful group of rich men who wish(ed)
a military man in the White House."
The American people, once again manifesting
their disapproval of the League, voted for Harding as an evidence
of that distrust and concern. Harding outpolled his opposition
by a greater margin than did President Wilson who had "kept
us out of the war" during the election of 1916. Wilson got
only fifty-two percent of the vote, and Harding got sixty-four
Harding was a supporter of William Howard
Taft, the President who opposed the bankers and their Federal
Reserve Bill. After his election, he named Harry M. Daugherty,
Taft's campaign manager, as his Attorney General.
His other Cabinet appointments were not
as wise, however, as he unexplainably surrounded himself with
men representing the oil industry.
0. his Secretary of State was Charles
Evans Hughes, an attorney of Standard Oil;
0. his Secretary of the Treasury was Andrew Mellon, owner of Gulf
0. his Postmaster General was Will Hays, an attorney for Sinclair
0. his Secretary of the Interior was Albert Fall, a protégé
of the oil men.
It was Mr. Fall who was to be President Harding's downfall, as
he later accepted a bribe from Harry Sinclair in exchange for
a lease of the Navy's oil reserves in Teapot Dome, Wyoming.
There are many who believe that the scandal
was intended to discredit the Harding administration in an attempt
to remove him from office for two very important reasons:
0. Harding was consistently vocal against
the League of Nations, and there was still a chance that its supporters
could get the United States to join as the League had survived
the Senate's prior refusal to ratify the treaty, and
0. Attorney General Daugherty had been prosecuting the oil trusts
under the Sherman anti-trust laws.
These activities did not please the oil interests who had created
the Teapot Dome scandal. But Harding unfortunately did not live
to see the full repercussions of the artificial scandal, as he
died on August 2, 1923, before the story completely surfaced.
(There are those who believe that there were some who couldn't
wait for the Teapot Dome Scandal to remove President Harding,
and that he was poisoned.)
But the oil interests allowed it to completely
play its course as a warning to future Presidents of the United
States not to oppose the oil interests.
The warning has been generally heeded.
Not many have chosen to contend with the true rulers of the United
What Really Caused World War 2?
The True Cause of the Second World War
The date of September 1, 1939, when Germany
invaded Poland, is remembered as the date the war started. But
little is remembered about the date Russia also moved into Poland,
on September 16,1939. The nation of Poland was now divided between
these two war-time allies.
It is interesting to notice what the responses
of the major allied nations were to these two dates. When Germany
entered the western portion of Poland, Britain and France declared
war on Germany. But when Russia moved into eastern Poland, there
was no war declaration by either nation.
The Soviets caused one of the tragic events
of history after they occupied their portion of Poland. They captured
approximately 10,000 Polish officers and brutally murdered them,
most of them meeting their death in Katyn Forest near the Russian
town of Smolensk. The traditional story about their deaths was
that the officers had been killed by the German army, but now
the evidence is clear that the Russians committed this crime.
The other victims were taken aboard a barge which was towed out
to sea and then sunk.
Even with all of these efforts of the
American businessman to construct the German war machine with
the full knowledge and approval of President Roosevelt, he kept
repeating that the nation would continue its "neutral"
position: it would remain out of the war. On September 1, 1939,
when the war started, he was asked by a reporter whether America
would stay out of the war and Roosevelt replied: "... I believe
we can, and every effort will be made by the Administration to
Roosevelt responded by appointing George
Marshall, a CFR member, as Chief of Staff of the Army over General
Douglas MacArthur, not a member of the CFR, and other senior officers.
Others did not believe Roosevelt's claim
that America would remain neutral. On September 12, 1939, Hans
Thomson, the German charge d'affaires in Washington, cabled the
German government: "... if defeat should threaten the Allies
(Great Britain and France), Roosevelt is determined to go to war
against Germany, even in the face of the resistance of his own
But Germany's war efforts were still dependent
on oil resources, and it came from a variety of sources, some
external to the German border. Before Rumania was invaded by the
Germans, it was selling oil to Germany. Life magazine of February
19, 1940, has a picture of Rumanian oil being loaded into oil
tank cars. The picture has a caption under it which reads, in
part: "Oil for Germany moves in these tank cars of American
Essolube and British Shell out of Creditui Minier yards near Ploesti
(Rumania.) Notice that cars are marked for German-American Oil
Co. and German Railways, consigned to Hamburg and Wuppertal in
Germany. They were sent from Germany to speed up Rumanian oil
shipments." This picture was taken after Germany had invaded
Austria and Poland, yet American and British oil companies are
transporting oil for the German government, (the tank cars in
the picture are dearly marked "Essolube," and "Shell").
And other sources supplied oil as well.
When the German air force ran short of fuel, this was generously
supplied from the great refinery belonging to the Standard Oil
Company situated on the island of Aruba via Spanish tankers. This
occurred during the war itself, yet these tankers were not sunk
by American submarines.
Even with the purchases of oil from non-German
sources, the major supplier of oil was still the cartel. The I.G.
Farben-Standard Oil cooperation for production of synthetic oil
from coal gave the I.G. Farben cartel a monopoly of German gasoline
production during World War II. Just under one half of German
high octane gasoline in 1945 was produced directly by I.G. Farben,
and most of the balance by its affiliated companies.
But as the war in Europe continued, America's
leaders were attempting to get America involved, even though the
American people didn't want to become part of it Roosevelt, the
presidential candidate, was promising the American people that
the Roosevelt administration would remain neutral should he be
re-elected. Others knew better. One, for instance, was General
Hugh Johnson, who said: "I know of no well informed Washington
observer who isn't convinced that, if Mr. Roosevelt is elected
(in 1940), he will drag us into war at the first opportunity,
and that, if none presents itself, he will make one."
Roosevelt had two opportunities to involve
America in World War II: Japan was at war with China, and Germany
was at war with Great Britain, France and other countries. Both
war zones presented plenty of opportunities to involve the American
government in the war, and Roosevelt was quick to seize upon the
His first opportunity came from the war
in the Pacific. It was in August, 1940, that the United States
broke the Japanese "purple" war-time code. This gave
the American government the ability to read and understand all
of their recoverable war-time messages. Machines were manufactured
to de-code Japan's messages, and they were sent all over the world,
but none was sent to Pearl Harbor.
Roosevelt's public efforts to involve
America, while ostensibly remaining neutral, started in August,
1940, when the National Guard was voted into Federal service for
one year. This was followed in September by the Selective Service
Act, also for one year's duration.
But the key to America's early involvement
occurred on September 28, 1940, when Japan, Germany and Italy
signed the Tripartite Treaty. This treaty required that any of
the three nations had to respond by declaring war should any one
of the other three be attacked by any of the Allied nations. This
meant that should Japan attack the United States, and the United
States responded by declaring war against Japan, it would automatically
be at war with the other two nations, Germany and Italy.
Roosevelt now knew that war with Japan
meant war with Germany. His problem was solved.
He had made secret commitments to Winston
Churchill and the English government to become involved in the
war against Germany and he knew that the only way he could fulfill
his secret commitments to Churchill to get us into the war, without
openly dishonoring his pledges to the American people to keep
us out, was by provoking Germany or Japan to attack.
Roosevelt moved towards the Pacific theater
first, knowing that, if he could provoke Japan to attack America
first, America would automatically be at war with Germany as well.
He also knew that, should Germany attack America, Japan would
have to declare war on America. So Roosevelt attempted to get
either nation to attack the United States first. Japan was to
get the first opportunity.
In October, 1940, Secretary of the Navy
Frank Knox sent for Admiral J.O. Richardson, Commander-in-Chief
of the American fleet in the Pacific. Knox advised him that the
President wanted him to establish a patrol of the Pacific-a wall
of American naval vessels stretched across the western Pacific
in such a way as to make it impossible for Japan to reach any
of her sources of supply; a blockade of Japan to prevent by force
her use of any part of the Pacific Ocean. Richardson protested
vigorously. He said that would be an act of war, and besides,
we would lose our navy. Of course Roosevelt had to abandon it.
This scene in history poses two rather
0. Why did Roosevelt, the Commander-in-Chief
of all armed forces, including the Navy, not directly order Admiral
Richardson to do as he wished? Why did he choose to use his Secretary
of the Navy to almost politely ask him to create the naval patrol?
0. Is it possible that Roosevelt did not choose to use his supreme
power because he knew that this was indeed an act of war and that
he did not want to be identified as the originator of the plan.
If Richardson had agreed to Knox's proposal, and Japan had attacked
an American naval vessel, Roosevelt could have directly blamed
the admiral for allowing the vessel to get into the position of
being fired upon by the Japanese Navy in the first place.
0. Roosevelt wanted a scapegoat and Richardson refused.
0. Why did Roosevelt not replace the admiral with someone who
would do exactly as he wished?
0. It is possible that Roosevelt realized that Richardson now
knew about the plan, and since he did not approve, he would be
in a position to clearly identify Roosevelt as the source of the
idea should the second admiral agree to it.
0. Roosevelt did not want to jeopardize his carefully constructed
image as a "dove" in the question of whether or not
America should become involved in the war.
It is important to remember that, in November, 1940, just after
this incident, candidate Roosevelt told the American people: "I
say to you fathers and mothers, and I will say it again and again
and again, your boys will not be sent into foreign wars."
Richardson later appraised his situation
at Pearl Harbor and felt that his position was extremely precarious.
He visited Roosevelt twice during 1940 to recommend that the fleet
be withdrawn to the west coast of America, because:
0. His ships were inadequately manned
0. The Hawaiian area was too exposed for Fleet training; and
0. The Fleet defenses against both air and submarine attacks were
far below the required standards of strength.
That meant that the American government had done nothing to shore
up the defenses of Pearl Harbor against an offshore attack since
the naval manuevers of 1932 discovered just how vulnerable the
Richardson's reluctance to provide Roosevelt's
incident for the United States to enter the war, and his concern
about the status of the Fleet, led to his being unexpectedly relieved
of the Fleet command in January, 1941.
The American Ambassador to Tokyo, Joseph
C. Grew, was one of the first to officially discover that Pearl
Harbor was the intended target of the Japanese attack, as he corresponded
with President Roosevelt's State Department on January 27, 1941:
"The Peruvian minister has informed a member of my staff
that he had heard from many sources, including a Japanese source,
that, in the event of trouble breaking out between the United
States and Japan, the Japanese intended to make a surprise attack
against Pearl Harbor...."
In March 1941, President Roosevelt was
still hoping for an incident involving the United States and Germany,
according to Harold Ickes, Roosevelt's Secretary of the Interior.
He reported: "At dinner on March 24, he [Roosevelt] remarked
that 'things are coming to a head; Germany will be making a blunder
soon.' There could be no doubt of the President's scarcely concealed
desire that there might be an incident which would justify our
declaring a state of war against Germany...."
Roosevelt and Churchill had conspired
together to incite an incident to allow America's entry into the
war. According to Churchill:
The President had said that he would wage
war but not declare it, and that he would become more and more
provocative. If the Germans did not like it, they could attack
The United States Navy was taking over
the convoy route to Iceland.
The President's orders to these escorts
were to attack any U-boat which showed itself, even if it were
two or three hundred miles away from the convoy....
Everything was to be done to force "an
Hitler would be faced with the dilemma
of either attacking the convoys and dashing with the United States
Navy or holding off, thus "giving us victory in the Battle
of the Atlantic. It might suit us in six or eight weeks to provoke
Hider by taunting him with this difficult choice."
But Hider was attempting to avoid a confrontation
with the United States. He had told his naval commanders at the
end of July  to avoid incidents with the United States while
the Eastern campaign [the war against Russia] was still in progress
.... A month later these orders were still in force.
Churchill even wrote to Roosevelt after
the German ship the Bismarck sank the British ship the Hood, recommending
in April, 1941: "... that an American warship should find
the Prinz Eugen (the escort to the Bismarck) then draw her fire,
'thus providing the incident for which the United States would
be so thankful,' i.e., bring her into the war."
Hitler was not as wise in other matters.
He attacked his "ally" Russia on June 22, 1941, even
though Germany and Russia had signed a treaty not to declare war
on each other.
With this action, the pressure to get
the United States involved in the war really accelerated. Roosevelt,
on June 24, 1941, told the American people: "Of course we
are going to give all the aid that we possibly can to Russia."
And an American program of Lend-Lease
began, supplying Russia enormous quantities of war materials,
all on credit.
So with Hitler pre-occupied with the war
against Russia and refusing to involve himself with the Americans
on the open sea, Roosevelt had to turn his attentions back to
Japan for the incident he needed.
The next step was to assist other countries,
the English and the Dutch, to embargo oil shipments to Japan in
an attempt to force them into an incident that would enable the
United States to enter the war.
Japan, as a relatively small island, and
with no oil industry to speak of, had to look elsewhere for its
oil, and this was the reason for the proposed embargo. It was
thought that this action would provoke Japan into an incident.
Ex-President Herbert Hoover also saw the manipulations leading
to war and he warned the United States in August, 1941: "The
American people should insistently demand that Congress put a
stop to step-by-step projection of the United States into undeclared
But the Congress wasn't listening.
President Roosevelt wasn't listening either
to the charges of Congressman Martin Dies, Chairman of the House
Committee on Un-American Activities. By August of 1941, the Dies
committee had assembled a large amount of evidence which more
than confirmed the suspicions which we had entertained on the
basis of surface appearances: It was clear that the Japanese were
preparing to invade Pearl Harbor and that they were in possession
of vital military information.
This information was made available to
the Roosevelt administration by Congressman Dies personally. But
this was the second time that Dies had appealed to Roosevelt about
his knowledge of Japan's intention to attack Pearl Harbor. Early
in 1941 the Dies Committee came into possession of a strategic
map which gave clear proof of the intentions of the Japanese to
make an assault on Pearl Harbor. The strategic map was prepared
by the Japanese Imperial Military Intelligence Department.
Dies telephoned Secretary of State Cordell
Hull who talked to President Roosevelt.
Congressman Dies was told not to release
the document to the public, and the Roosevelt administration did
nothing. (In April, 1964, when Dies told the American public of
these revelations, he added this comment: "If anyone questions
the veracity and accuracy of these statements, I will be glad
to furnish him with conclusive proof.")
It was also in August, 1941, when the
new product of the I.G. Farben cartel was tested on humans for
the first time. The product was called Zyklon B and it was to
be used on the Jews and others at the concentration camps.
In the Pacific Theater, Japan's war messages,
being read in Washington, started asking their spy in Pearl Harbor
to report ship movements, and, later, the exact nature and location
of the ships in the harbor.
Japan's request for more information on
what was happening at Pearl Harbor was followed on October 16,
1941, by the resignation of the Prince's cabinet in Japan. These
resignations were followed by the military administration of General
Tojo and his cabinet. All of this activity was recognized by the
American government as a decided step toward war, but still nothing
was done to alert Pearl Harbor.
It was on this day that Henry Stimson,
Roosevelt's Secretary of War, wrote the following in his diary:
"... and so we face the delicate question of the diplomatic
fencing to be done so as to be sure that Japan be put into the
wrong and to make the first bad move-overt move."
Stimson was to repeat this concern that
faced the Roosevelt administration when he testified before one
of the Committees investigating Pearl Harbor. There he was quoted
as saying: "The question was how we should maneuver them
[the Japanese] into the position of firing the first shot without
allowing too much danger to ourselves."
The Japanese would still not respond with
the incident to provoke the United States into retaliating, but
America was convinced that it would happen ultimately. For instance,
Secretary of State Cordell Hull told Roosevelt on November 7,
1941, that he foresaw "every possibility of an early war
Japan continued its efforts towards staying
out of a war with the United States and had its Ambassador in
Washington continue his efforts towards securing a no-war treaty
with the Secretary of State. On November 22, 1941, they wired
their Ambassador: "Do your best, spare no efforts and try
to bring about the solution we desire."
But even though Japan was attempting to
avoid war with the United States, the Japanese were being encouraged
by an unlikely source to strike out at the United States. On May
17, 1951, the New York Daily News featured an article by its Washington
correspondent, John O'Donnell, concerning various old Far Eastern
intelligence reports which were being closely guarded in Washington.
Among those documents were the 32,000 word confession of Soviet
spy Richard Sorge.
Mr. Sorge was a Russian spy who had infiltrated
the German embassy in Japan and worked hard to convince Japanese
officials that Japan should not attack Russia, but move south,
at the risk of war with the United States.
When Sorge informed the Kremlin [in Russia]
in October, 1941, that the Japanese intended to attack Pearl Harbor
within 60 days, he received thanks for his report and the notice
that Washington - Roosevelt, Marshall, Admiral Stark, et al. -
had been advised of the Japanese intentions.
On November 25,1941, the day that the
Japanese fleet sailed for Pearl Harbor, President Roosevelt convened
a meeting of the various Cabinet officers: Secretaries Stimson,
Knox, Marshall and Admiral Harold R. Stark, Chief of Naval Operations.
According to Stimson's testimony: "The President brought
up the event that we were likely to be attacked perhaps [as soon
as] next Monday, for the Japanese are notorious for making an
attack without warning. In spite of the risk involved, however,
in letting the Japanese fire the first shot, we realized that
in order to have the full support of the American people, it was
desirable to make sure that the Japanese be the ones to do this
so that there should remain no doubt in anyone's mind as to who
were the aggressors."
On November 26, 1941, the Japanese Embassy
in Washington sent the following message to Tokyo: "Hull
said... I am sorry to tell you that we cannot agree to it [Japan's
The British Intelligence Service, which
had men inside the Japanese diplomatic agencies in the United
States, took the November 26th telegram to Tokyo as meaning that
the "Japanese negotiations off. Services expect action within
And Roosevelt and the Department of the
Army also knew this, as "... a very important American Army
Intelligence officer, in service in the Far East during 1941...
had gained knowledge of the Yamamoto plan to send a task force
to attack Pearl Harbor and sent three separate messages to Washington
revealing this information, and at least two of these reached
the Army files well before the attack on Pearl Harbor."
Finally, in desperation, the Japanese
government sent a message to their Washington embassy on December
6, 1941, in essence breaking off all negotiations with the American
government After the message was intercepted by the American government,
de-coded and given to Roosevelt, he is quoted as saying: "This
Roosevelt now knew that Japan planned
on attacking the United States, but still he did nothing about
warning the American forces at Pearl Harbor.
And on December 7,1941, Japan launched
a "surprise attack."
The American forces were not prepared
for the attack. And the attacking Japanese forces had orders from
Japan to return to Japan should they detect any evidence that
the Americans had been alerted.
As their air force attacked Pearl Harbor,
they reported that the American planes were having difficulty
in getting off the ground.
This was because the American planes had
been grouped in circles, with their propellers all facing inward
as the result of an order by President Roosevelt. It was reported
that Roosevelt had ordered the planes grouped in this fashion
because he feared "acts of sabotage" against the planes
and he was acting to protect them.
Since airplanes do not have a "reverse
gear" the grouping of the planes in this manner made it extremely
difficult for them to rapidly get out of the circle and into the
air. One critic of the circling of these airplanes, Harry Elmer
Barnes, has written: "Bunching the planes in a circle, wing
to wing, would [make them] helpless in the event of a surprise
Another strange circumstance was the make-up
of the fleet anchored at Pearl Harbor at the time of the attack.
The Pacific Fleet consisted of nine battleships and three aircraft
carriers along with a host of smaller ships.
During the attack, the Japanese sank or
seriously damaged eight battleships but no aircraft carriers.
The American government had reasoned that
the aircraft carriers would have an extremely important role to
play in the type of war they felt would be waged in the Pacific
theater. So all of the aircraft carriers were moved out of Pearl
Harbor and all of the less valuable battleships were left behind.
The battleships were expendable because most of them had been
constructed prior to or during World War I, which meant that they
were old and obsolete.
Along with the aircraft carriers, Roosevelt's
government also withdrew the smaller, more mobile ships that they
knew could be more efficiently utilized in a sea war. On November
28th, Admiral William F. Halsey was sent to Wake Island with the
carrier Enterprise, three heavy destroyers and nine destroyers.
On December 5th, Admiral John E. Newton was sent to Midway with
the carrier Lexington, three heavy cruisers and five destroyers.
The carrier Saratoga had been sent to the Pacific Coast.
Admiral Husband Kimmel, the commander
of the naval forces at Pearl Harbor, clearly places the blame
for Pearl Harbor's unpreparedness on President Roosevelt. He has
written: "We were unready at Pearl Harbor because President
Roosevelt's plans required that no word be sent to alert the fleet
The Rt Hon. Oliver Lyttleton, a member
of Churchill's war cabinet, declared in an address to the American
Chamber of Commerce in London on June 24, 1944: "America
provoked [the Japanese] to such an extent that the Japanese were
forced to attack Pearl Harbor. It is a travesty of history to
say that America was forced into the war."
The Council on Foreign Relations published
an article in its publication called Foreign Affairs in January,
1974, that agreed with Lyttleton. The article stated that "Japan's
attack on Pearl Harbor actually thrust the United States into
World War II, but the Roosevelt administration decided a year
and a half earlier to risk war in order to prevent the totalitarian
domination of all Europe."
So on December 8, 1941, President Roosevelt
asked the Congress to declare war on Japan, stating that December
7, 1941 would go down in history as a "day of infamy."
So when Roosevelt addressed the nation
through his speech in Congress, he lied when he said: "We
don't like it - and we didn't want to get in it - but we are in
it and we're going to fight it with everything we've got."
So Roosevelt asked for, and received,
a Declaration of War against Japan. Germany followed on December
11th with a Declaration of War against the United States. This
action was in accordance with the terms of the Tripartite Treaty
signed earlier by Germany, Italy and Japan.
Roosevelt's activities in the planning
of Pearl Harbor had a costly price. The final toll was 2,341 U.S.
servicemen dead and 1,143 wounded; eighteen ships including the
eight battleships were sunk or heavily damaged; more than two
hundred Army Air Corps and Navy planes were destroyed or unusable;
and sixty-eight civilians were killed.
For his supposed unpreparedness at Pearl
Harbor, Admiral Kimmel was relieved of his command, and he retired
on January 7, 1942.
After the war was over. Congress looked
into the reasons for the lack of preparation at Pearl Harbor.
Their conclusions are most revealing:
The attack was unprovoked by America;
There was no evidence that the President,
Secretary of State, Secretary of War, Secretary of Navy, provoked
The American government made every effort
to avoid the war with Japan;
The attack was caused by the Army's and
Navy's failure to detect hostile forces; and
The errors made were errors of judgment
and not derelictions of duty.
The last conclusion was apparently intended
to relieve the commanders of the armed forces from responsibility
so that they could not be court-martialed. Admiral Kimmel and
General Walter C. Short, the commander of the armed forces at
Pearl Harbor, continuously pleaded for a court martial to clear
their reputations, but they were never granted.
Admiral Robert Theobold, the Commander
of all destroyers at Pearl Harbor, wrote a book entitled The Final
Secret of Pearl Harbor, in which he detailed his conclusions about
the "surprise attack." He wrote:
President Roosevelt forced Japan to war
and enticed them to initiate hostilities by holding the Pacific
fleet in Hawaiian waters as an invitation to that attack;
The plans to use Pearl Harbor as the bait
started in June, 1940;
War with Japan meant war with Germany;
Roosevelt, Marshall and Stark knew about
Pearl Harbor 21 hours before the attack.
But in spite of all of this evidence that
the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was known by Roosevelt and
his top advisors well in advance of that actual event, there are
those who still hold to the position that the government, and
Roosevelt specifically, knew nothing about it.
So America now had a two-front war against
Japan in the Pacific and against Germany in Europe.
The Planned World War 3 - A Play in Numerous
World War Three in Brief
A Three World War scenario was developed
several decades ago (see Conspiratorial History). Two World Wars
have already been achieved, and the Third and final World War
envisions an attack on Iraq, Iran and/or Syria as being the trigger
to set the entire Middle East into fiery conflagration. Once America
is firmly entrenched into the Middle East with the majority of
her first-line units, North Korea is to attack South Korea. Then,
with America's forces stretched well beyond the limit, China is
to invade Taiwan. This will usher in the start of World War Three.
World War Definition:
What constitutes a 'world war'? How many
countries need to be involved? And who decides at which point
a number of regional skirmishes can be grouped together and called
a World War? At the time, who called the official start of World
War 1 and World War 2?
And have you noticed that although the
term 'World War Three' is freely used in the alternative press
and on the Internet, all the major news networks have stoically
avoided using any phrase reminiscent of World War.
Since it's difficult to find a definition
for an event which has only happened twice in modern history,
here's my attempt at an answer to the question 'what constitutes
a world war'?
A World War is a military conflict spanning
more than 2 continents, in which at least 20 major countries participate
in an attack against a common enemy, and which has the attention
of the man-in-the-street due to the significant loss of life.
With that definition, we can agree that
WW1 and WW2 were in fact World Wars (both wars involved some degree
of participation from most of the world's then existing countries:
Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United States and
the Soviet Union). We can also agree that we are very close to
achieving World War 3. The only requirement left to fulfill the
start of WW3 is that of a military conflict spanning more than
2 continents. As soon as Israel attacks Palestine, or North Korea
attacks South Korea or the US, or China invades Taiwan, we will
have the next World War well underway.
World War 3 Timeline
These are, I believe, the elements of
the planned Third World War:
Prelude - The events leading up to the
start of World War Three, including Sept 11, 2001.
Act 1 - The Middle East. Widespread conflict
to bring the entire region into the flames of war, possibly triggered
by Iran or militants in Pakistan using North Korean supplied nuclear
arms. The first Scene in this Act is the US Invasion of Iraq on
March 20, 2003.
Act 2 - Israel at War -- Against her Arab
neighbors, possibly Palestine. A Palestinian State will be established,
so that all Israelis will be fully separated from Palestinians
(listen out for mention of a 7-year treaty to be confirmed by
a World Leader - probably Bush), only for Israel to viciously
attack Palestine shortly thereafter.
Act 3 - Far East -- "Hair-raising
nuclear confrontation that threatens mankind's existence"
- Peter Lemesurier, author of The Armageddon Script, p. 223, written
in 1981. Includes China invading Taiwan and a nuclear eruption
on the Korean Peninsula.
Act 4 - Erosion of Confidence in 'The
System' so severe citizens will be panicked into giving up liberties
and Constitutional form of government. The plan calls for the
dissolution of the US Constitution, triggered by a significant
enough 'terrorist' attack. The ultimate intent is to introduce
a global government and one-world religion.
Act 5 - The collapse of the US, and other
Western economies and morals.
Act 6 - Significant population reduction
using natural and man-made disasters.
Nostradamus had a lot to say about the
years we are currently living and World War 3 in general.
Both Biblical prophecy and the Illuminati
plan state that Israel is the key. The Third World War is planned
to begin when Israel goes to war against her Arab enemies. Then
and only then will all the other elements begin to occur and they
will occur in rapid succession. The plan is to have one disaster
following another in such rapid succession that, before people
can mentally and emotionally handle one disastrous news event,
they will be hit with another. It is also true to say that until
ALL the elements for WW3 are in place, the plan will not commence.
While it would be naive to suggest a specific
timeline for the events leading up to and including World War
3, we do know that the plans for World War 3 are well advanced,
and our leaders involved in this secret plan are waiting only
for the right signal before all-out war begins.
We are in the last stages of the preparation
to so globalize the world that the Masonic New Age Christ (Antichrist)
can appear to receive all the political and economic power of
the world's rulers. This is the Illuminati plan and Biblical prophecy
In the words of Peter Lemesurier, author
of The Armageddon Script:
"Their script is now written, subject
only to last-minute editing and stage-directions. The stage itself,
albeit in darkness, is almost ready. Down in the pit, the subterranean
orchestra is already tuning up. The last-minute, walk-on parts
are even now being filled. Most of the main actors, one suspects,
have already taken up their roles. Soon it will be time for them
to come on stage, ready for the curtain to rise. The time for
action will have come."
Ladies and Gentlemen, please take your
seats and welcome on stage the players of this Grand Play: World
Between 1776-1788, Edward Gibbons published
a huge six volume work entitled The History Of The Decline And
Fall Of The Roman Empire. Gibbons' work was scholarly and monumental,
as it thoroughly covered a period of history spanning approximately
1,200 years. His goal in producing this study was to precisely
catalog the reasons for the rise of the Roman Empire and the factors
leading to the decline and fall of the Empire. Gibbons was universally
hailed as achieving his objective brilliantly.
But, Gibbons not only created a document
which details how and why the Roman Empire rose and fell; he created
a document which detailed precisely how a successful and powerful
Empire could be subverted and destroyed.
Gibbons listed five basic reasons that
the enormous Roman Empire was destroyed:
1 - The dramatic increase of divorce undermined
the institution of the family.
2 - The imposition of higher taxes undermined
the economic stability and vitality of the Empire. Taxes were
raised to pay for deficit government spending, to pay for food
for all in society and to pay for government-sponsored activities
of diversion, such as circuses and sports. Interestingly, as the
time of the final collapse drew closer, greater emphasis was placed
on sports, to divert the attention of the public from the distressing
news of massive trouble within the Empire.
3 - The drive for personal pleasure had
become very intense, even to the point of obsession. Gibbons noted
that, at the very end, sports had become more exciting and brutal.
4 - People lost their faith, both religiously
and in their government. Paganism gave way to Christianity and
the efficient Roman Government gave way to chaos and disintegration.
5 - Hidden conspirators were working within
the government to secretly destroy it. They worked quietly, invisibly
and deceitfully; during the entire time they were secretly dismantling
the government of the Roman Empire, they publicly proclaimed their
unswerving support of it.
New World Order