Collateral Damage
excerpted from the book
The Perpetual Prisoner Machine
How America Profits From Crime
by Joel Dyer
Westview Press, 2001, paper
p177
David B. Kopel, Prison Blues: How America's Foolish Sentencing
Policies Endanger Public Safety, May 17, 1994
In the last fifteen years, American elected officials have required
prisons to engage in a bold social experiment. The historical
prison policy - the incarceration of violent criminals - has been
replaced with a policy of using prisons mainly to punish drug
offenders with increasingly severe, mandatory terms in increasingly
overcrowded prisons. The social experiment has been a failure.
p177
... American voters have fallen prey to the old "bait-and-switch"
routine. When politicians take their public opinion polls, they
see that the electorate has an exaggerated concern about being
victimized by violent crime - the type they see on their TVs nightly.
As a result, politicians promise their constituents that they
will wage a war against this violent crime, but this is where
the switch comes into play.
In their attempt to appear as though they are following through
on their campaign promises, politicians have enacted one impressive
sounding draconian sentencing measure after another-three strikes,
hundreds of mandatory sentences, and truth in sentencing. Subsequently,
they have reported to their constituents that they have tripled
the prison population. People naturally assume that this means
that there are a million fewer violent criminals on the streets,
but they are wrong. The truth is that 70 to 80 percent of all
of those being affected by these incredibly harsh sentencing measures
are nonviolent offenders-many of them first-time, low-level drug
offenders, and most of them low-income minority citizens whose
rehabilitation could be safely and more effectively accomplished
outside the prison structure for a small fraction of the current
cost to taxpayers.
By 1990, 88.9 percent of first-time drug offenders with no
prior record were being sentenced to prison for an average term
of 68.4 months by the federal courts. Only 79.4 percent of first-time
violent offenders were sentenced to prison by the same courts,
and those who had committed violent crimes were serving on average
less than fifty-seven months behind bars. By 1997, Justice Department
figures showed that the average time served by individuals convicted
of murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault had dropped to
only forty-nine months.
Such statistics make perfect sense when you consider that
even with the amazing growth in the number of prison beds in the
United States since 1980, if mandatory minimum sentences are being
applied disproportionately to nonviolent crimes such as drug cases,
there simply isn't enough prison space to hold violent offenders
not covered by the mandatory sentences. As a result, it can, and
has been, argued that we are actually replacing violent offenders
with nonviolent criminals in our prisons.
Such is the position taken by sociologist Robert Figlio, who
suggests that most violent crimes are committed by a few sociopaths.
Figlio believes that if these few repeat offenders were taken
off the street for long periods of time, violent crime would be
dealt a substantial blow. Figlio also believes that this has not
been accomplished because of the lack of prison space, a result
of the massive incarceration of nonviolent drug offenders.
David Kopel also holds this view. In his policy analysis for
the CATO Institute titled Prison Blues, Kopel uses Department
of Justice statistics to convincingly demonstrate that the actual
sentences being served by those convicted of violent crime have
been decreasing since 1980 as a result of the increasing sentences
being served for nonviolent crimes. Likewise, a study conducted
in Illinois found that incidents of violent crime in that state
actually rose as a result of increased drug enforcement. The report
found that the incarceration of nonviolent drug offenders was
forcing the early release of violent prisoners.
Although it may be true that violent criminals are being released
to make room for nonviolent offenders sentenced under mandatory
minimums, I believe that the overall danger to the public from
such early releases has been greatly exaggerated by the media
and law enforcement. Still, it is somewhat ironic that the war
on violent crime, which we are told is being waged because the
public wants it, has turned out to be a conflict that fills our
prisons with so many nonviolent offenders that it is forcing the
release of those whom the public rightfully fears the most. Clearly
those who have established these misguided policies must do everything
within their power to conceal the realities of their actions from
the public Failure to do so would likely put an end to using crime
as a campaign tool and in the end, it would significantly threaten
the new multibillion-dollar industry that now revolves around
prisons. As a result, a good deal of statistical spin has been
generated to obscure the truth.
p181
In 1983 ... approximately one in twelve, or 57,975 inmates were
locked up on drug charges. By 1993, only ten years later, 353,564
people-more than one out of every four inmates-were doing time
as a result of drug infractions. Between 1985 and 1994, 71 percent
of prisoners added to the federal prison system were imprisoned
on drug charges, and the incarceration of one out of every three
state prisoners added during this same period stemmed from drug
arrests. Not only were most new prisoners doing time for drugs,
they were doing more time than violent criminals, thanks to the
mandatory sentences being dictated by Congress.
America's prison population is 94 percent male, even though
women are now the fastest growing sector of those imprisoned.
A full 65 percent of our prisoners never completed high school,
which helps to explain why so many of them are illiterate. Thirty-three
percent were unemployed and another 32 percent were making less
than $5,000 per year at the time of their arrest. These last statistics
clearly support the opinion that poverty is the single greatest
influence over criminal behavior. Seventy-one percent of all prisoners
have been convicted of nonviolent crimes, mostly for drug-related
and property-offense violations. Nearly 60 percent of all those
in prison or jail claim that they were under the influence of
drugs or alcohol at the time they committed their crime. Studies
conducted in 1999 found that between 16 percent and 24 percent
of all inmates are suffering from "extreme mental problems."
And finally, in the l990s, the majority of all prisoners are minority
citizens.
Since 1984, as a result of what has been described as "the
discriminatory nature" of the Sentencing Reform Act, in addition
to the mandatory sentences established by Congress and the racially
defined law enforcement practices now being applied in jurisdictions
all across the country, the black and Hispanic prison populations
have exploded. Between 1986 and 1991, the number of black males
imprisoned for drug offenses increased by 429 percent. The number
for black females incarcerated for drugs during this same period
skyrocketed by 828 percent, and the number of Hispanic drug offenders
in prison swelled by 320 percent. In contrast, the number of white
drug offenders being imprisoned during this same period barely
doubled, despite the fact that the majority of U.S. drug users
are white.
According to The Sentencing Project, an independent source
of policy analysis and data established in 1986 and widely used
by both news media and policymakers, African Americans constitute
only 13 percent of all monthly drug users, yet they account for
35 percent of all arrests
for the possession of drugs, 55 percent of all drug convictions,
and a shocking 74 percent of all those receiving drug-related
prison sentences. Because of this multiple, which logic tells
us has its roots in race-biased actions on the part of law enforcement,
the courts, and those who write the laws, thirty-eight state prison
systems reported significant increases in the racial disparity
of their prison populations between 1988 and 1994. By the end
of this period, the incarceration of blacks in all state prisons
combined was 7.66 times that of whites. Twelve states and the
District of Columbia reported that black incarceration was running
at more than ten to one compared to whites.
Like other aspects of the bait-and-switch approach to fighting
crime, this disparity in incarceration rates of different racial
groups has nothing to do with the commission rates of violent
crimes. The imprisonment of black violent offenders increased
at a nearly identical rate to that of white violent offenders
during this same period, which means that the 7.66 to 1 differential
in black and white incarceration has most likely resulted from
nonviolent drug convictions.
There is no better or more damning example of racist sentencing
practices than the well-publicized crack versus powder cocaine
mandatory sentences. These two forms of the same drug have been
treated in wildly differing fashions by Congress, even though
the only major difference in these two types of cocaine-despite
media hype to the contrary-is in the color of the hands they are
most often found at the time of arrest-crack in brown, powder
in white. This is not to say that more blacks than whites use
crack but rather that more blacks are arrested for crack than
whites. In fact, according to the Department of Health and Human
Services, 64.4 percent of crack users are white and only 26.6
percent are black. Even so, a study conducted in 1992 by the U.S.
Sentencing Commission found that 91.3 percent of the people who
were sentenced under the federal crack laws were black. Only 3
percent of those sentenced for federal crack offenses were white.
These lopsided statistics become even more alarming when you realize
that the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines that have been established
by Congress are 100 times more severe than those for powdered
cocaine.
Since the passage of the 1986 Crime Bill, a person caught
with 5 grams of crack receives a mandatory sentence of five years,
and 5.1 grams draws a ten-year sentence. With regard to powdered
cocaine, the same bill required the possession of 500 grams to
trigger an equal sentence. Crack cocaine is more prevalent in
low-income communities because it is considerably cheaper than
the powdered version of the drug, which tends to be a fashionable
high among people who more closely resemble the appearance and
status of those in Congress-wealthy and white.
p185
As a result of establishing sentencing guidelines and law-enforcement
practices that prey upon those living in poverty while tending
to allow the wealthy to avoid prison, nearly one in three of all
black American men between the ages of twenty and twenty-nine
are now under the supervision of the criminal justice system on
any given day. And as I mentioned previously, if the current race-biased
trends in our justice system continue, it is estimated that by
the year 2020, two out of three African-American men between the
ages of eighteen and thirty-tour will be in prison, at which time
we will find ourselves incarcerating 6.9 million of our minority
citizens. Is it any wonder that some critics of our current criminal
justice policies have once again begun to use the "S"
word-"slavery"?
p186
Jerome Miller, former youth corrections officer
The race card has changed the whole playing field. Because the
prison system doesn't affect a significant percentage of young
white men, we'll increasingly see prisoners treated as commodities.
For now the situation is a bit more benign than it was back in
the nineteenth century, but I'm not sure it will stay that way
for long.
p223
Shaheen Borna, "Free Enterprise Goes to Prison," 1986
"Since profits depend on the existence and expansion
of the prison population, corporations will attempt to increase
both the number of prisoners and the length of their stay."
p239
Reinhold Niebuhr, Children of Light and Children of Darkness,
1944
"Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible,
but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary."
p252
Voltaire
"The art of government is to make two-thirds of a nation
pay all it possibly can pay for the benefit of the other third."
p255
National Criminal Justice Commission, 1995
"It troubles the Commission that the size of the American
prison population and the number of people living in poverty both
increased dramatically in the 1980s. Worse, the growth of each
seemed to feed off oft he growth of the other. This is because
funding for prison expansion came largely at the expense of programs
designed to alleviate poverty."
p261
Herbert I. Schiller, Information Inequality, 1996
"The United States global industrial pre-eminence may
be slipping, but the domestic output and international sale of
one of its manufacturers is booming-packaged consciousness. Packaged
consciousness-a one-dimensional, smooth-edged cultural product-is
made by the ever expanding goliaths of the message and image business.
Gigantic entertainment- information complexes exercise a near-seamless
and unified private corporate control over what we think, and
think about."
p267
Some states already have as many as five black males in prison
for every one in college...
p267
So long as black families constitute a disproportionately high
percentage of the impoverished households in our country, they
will continue to be sucked into the prisoner machine's turbines
at a disproportionately high rate.
p267
... a nearly inconceivable 4 million mostly poor U.S. citizens
have already lost their right to vote due to a felony conviction.
This includes 1.5 million African Americans, including 14 percent
of all black males. This stripping of voting rights is seriously
impacting the very urban areas where a healthy electorate is most
needed in order to effect change quickly, and the number of low-income
minority citizens losing their right to self-determination is
continuing to grow like the number of hamburgers sold at McDonald's.
If this trend continues at the current rate, it is estimated that
40 percent of the next generation of black men will not have the
right to vote. They will truly have achieved commodity status.
The
Perpetual Prisoner Machine
Index
of Website
Home
Page