Rogue State:
A history of U.S. terror
by Katherine Dwyer
International Socialist Review,
November-December 2001
The unlawful use of force or violence
committed by a group or individual, who has some connection to
a foreign power or whose activities transcend national boundaries,
against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government,
the civilian population, or any segment thereof in furtherance
of political or social objectives.
FBI definition of international terrorism'
Terrorism is premeditated, politically
motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by
subnational groups or clandestine state agents.
Patterns of Global Terrorism: 1983, U.S.
Department of State, September 1984
If they turn on their radars we're going
to blow up their goddamn SAMs [surface-to-air missiles]. They
know we own their country. We own their airspace.... We dictated
the way they live and talk. And that's what's great about America
right now. Its a good thing, especially when there's a lot of
oil out there we need.
U.S. Brigadier General William Looney,
one director of the continued U.S. bombing campaign of Iraq
I will never apologize for the United
States of America. I don't care what the facts are.
George H. W. Bush, then U.S. vice president,
referring to an American ship that shot down an Iranian passenger
plane, killing 290 civilians
A terrorist is someone who has a bomb
but doesn't have an airforce.
William Blum, Rogue State
Using either the FBI or the State Department
definition of terrorism, the U.S. must be considered a terrorist
state. Since 1945, the United States has tried to overthrow more
than 40 governments and repressed at least 30 popular movements
outside U.S. borders. U.S. officials have funded and trained a
long list of assassins, death squad leaders, and bombers to aid
them in these projects.
A White House commission report on the
CIA from 1954 makes it very clear that the U.S. reserves the right
to use whatever means it chooses to defend its own interests,
including what would count as "terrorism" from any other
source:
If the United States is to survive, long-standing
American concepts of "fair play" must be reconsidered.
We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services
and must learn to subvert, sabotage, and destroy our enemies by
more clever, more sophisticated, and more effective methods than
those used against us. It may become necessary that the American
people be made acquainted with, understand, and support this fundamentally
repugnant philosophy.
The U.S. has infiltrated, invaded, bombed,
and destroyed more countries than any other nation on earth in
order to further its own political and economic interests. The
U.S. is the only nation ever to use the ultimate weapon of mass
destruction, the atomic bomb. It has used chemical weapons in
vast quantities abroad-not to mention its experimentation with
them on civilians inside U.S. borders. Whether covertly or overtly,
by proxy or directly, the U.S. has always used terror to achieve
its aims. The main thing that sets the U.S. apart is that it is
richer, better equipped, and more systematic-and thus capable
of inflicting terror on a far broader scale than its enemies.
That's why civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.
once called the U.S. government "the greatest purveyor of
violence in the world." What follows are some examples of
terror, U.S. style.
Vietnam
After the Second World War, the U.S. backed
France in its efforts to maintain its colonies in Indochina, fearing
the "domino effect" if Vietnam were to achieve independence.
The U.S. refused to allow Vietnam to reunite after it was divided
in 1954, creating a puppet regime in the South. Over a several-year
period, the U.S. escalated its military presence to defeat the
national liberation movement. The method employed by the U.S.
in Vietnam was to defeat the guerrilla armies by destroying the
civilian population. To meet this goal, the U.S. dropped 15 million
tons of ordnance on Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia-more than twice
the amount it used during the Second World War.
It is now believed that the U.S. and its
allies killed as many as 5 million Southeast Asian citizens during
the active war years. The numbers of dead in Laos and Cambodia
remain uncounted, but as of 1971, a Congressional Research Service
report prepared for the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee
indicated that over one million Laotians had been killed, wounded,
and refugeed, with the figure for Cambodia being two million.
More than a half million "secret" U.S. bombing missions
of Laos that began in late 1964 devastated whole populations of
ancient cultures there. Estimates indicate that around 230,000
tons of bombs were dropped over northern Laos in 1968 and 1969
alone. Increasing numbers of U.S. military personnel were added
on the Laotian ground in 1961.... "Secret" bombing of
Cambodia had begun in March 1969.... When the bombing in Cambodia
finally ceased, the U.S. Air Force had officially recorded dropping
nearly 260,000 tons of bombs there. The total tonnage of bombs
dropped in Laos over eight-and-a-half years exceeded two million.
The consensus now is that more than 3
million Vietnamese were killed, with 300,000 additional missing
in action and presumed dead.
In the ground war, the army and marines
conducted "search and destroy" missions in which the
killing of civilians was a common occurrence. We are more familiar
with the My Lai massacre, in which U.S. forces massacred 500 villagers,
but such incidents were not aberrations, as a report from an incident
in April 1968, described by a member of the 2nd Battalion, 27th
Marines, makes clear. After soldiers were ordered to "torch"
a village where they were unable to find "snipers,"
there was a lot of screaming and just
chaos coming from the direction of the village and a lot of people
started running out of the tree line. From where I was standing,
I saw maybe two or three male villagers and the rest were women
and children- some of the children walking and some of them young
enough to be carried, l would say under a year, maybe. The last
thing I heard as a command was the gunnery sergeant told them
to open fire to keep them back. Their village was on fire and
they were in panic; they didn't stop, so they just cut down the
women and children with mortars, machine guns, tanks, snipers.
Another soldier commented, "When
Calley [the lieutenant in charge during the My Lai massacre-editors
note] and his people went through there, it was not the first
time anyone went through My Lai and put the torch to it, nor was
it the last time."
Vietnam became a testing ground for the
newest U.S. weapons-including chemical weapons. In 1961, the U.S.
initiated a new program of developing "herbicidal warfare"
in Vietnam. Between 1962 and 1970, the U.S. dropped 100 million
pounds of Agent Orange and other types of herbicide over 4 million
acres of land in Vietnam and burned millions more. By the end
of the war, 25 million acres of farmland and 12 million acres
of forest were destroyed. Five-hundred pounds of the highly toxic
and almost indestructible substance dioxin remained in Vietnam
as a result of mass spraying of Agent Orange. Dioxin is so potent
that experts estimate that only three ounces in the New York City
water supply would kill the city's entire population. The U.S.
also experimented with poison gas and other toxic substances.
In at least one instance, the CIA used influenza in an attempt
to cripple a village.
U.S. experts figured out how to intensify
the toxic impact of many of their weapons. One U.S. pilot described
how napalm-hundreds of thousands of gallons of which were dropped
in Vietnam-was transformed into a more deadly tool of chemical
warfare:
We sure are pleased with those backroom
boys at Dow. The original product wasn't so hot-if the gooks were
quick they could scrape it off. So the boys started adding polystyrene-
now it sticks like shit to a blanket. But then if the gooks jumped
under water it stopped burning, so they started adding Willie
Peter [WP-white phosphorous] so's to make it burn better. It'll
even burn under water now. And one drop is enough, it'll keep
on burning right down to the bone so they die anyway from phosphorous
poisoning.
On top of the millions that the U.S. killed,
two million Vietnamese were exposed to various poisons as a result
of the U.S. war. Inside Vietnam, rates of birth defects and multiple
miscarriages skyrocketed after the war, and returning U.S. soldiers
passed crippling diseases like cancer on to their children. Tens
of thousands more died in Vietnam after the war from unexploded
ordnance left by the U.S. forces. Widespread chromosomal damage
and neurological disorders have been reported as a direct result
of the chemical warfare waged by the United States.
International terrorist networks U.S.
style
If Bush is truly concerned with uprooting
international networks of terrorists, he can begin at home. The
U.S. not only harbors many famous international terrorists-it
is the world's number one sponsor of terrorist networks.
It would be difficult to imagine a more
far-reaching network of international terrorists than the United
States' own Central Intelligence Agency. Since its formation in
1947, the CIA has employed thousands as one part of the U.S. strategy
to maintain hegemony during the Cold War. The CIA enlisted anyone
that could serve as an ally in the battle against the Soviet Union.
This policy included protecting and hiring German Nazis after
the Second World War-even some directly implicated in atrocities
against Jews-to enlist them in the new anticommunist crusade.
The notorious Gestapo officer Klaus Barbie, for example, was smuggled
out of Germany and hired by U.S. intelligence in 1947.
The CIA trained and helped to fund-through
the elicit cocaine trade-the Nicaraguan contras. Drawn from former
military personnel of the Somoza dictatorship and right-wing opponents
of the Sandinista revolution, the contras were created, in the
words of then-chairman of Americas Watch, to conduct "a planned
strategy of terrorism" against the Sandinista regime. Ronald
Reagan called them "freedom fighters." Former contra
director Edgar Chamorro explained how the contras, from bases
in Honduras, operated:
FDN [the main contra organization] units
would arrive at an
undefended village, assemble the residents in the town square
and then proceed to kill-in full view of the others-all persons
suspected of working for the Nicaraguan Government or the FSLN
[Sandinista National Liberation Front], including police, local
militia members, party members, health workers teachers, and farmers
from government-sponsored cooperatives.
The U.S. is home to its very own terrorist
training school, the School of the Americas (SOA), now located
in Fort Benning, Georgia. The SOA was formed in 1946, one year
before the CIA was created, in order to train Latin American dictators,
death squad leaders, and military and police officers. The school
has trained such notorious figures as El Salvador's Roberto D'Abuisson,
a 1972 graduate and the death squad leader responsible for the
murder of Archbishop Oscar Romero in 1980. SOA graduate Leopoldo
Galtieri, dictator of Argentina between 1981 and 1982, was responsible
for the death or disappearance of more than 30,000 people. Colonel
Julio Roberto Alpirez, a two-time graduate of the SOA and a CIA
"asset," commanded the Guatemalan security force responsible
for the deaths of more than 100,000 people throughout the course
of a four-decade counterinsurgency war.
El Salvador's Atlacatl Battalion's leaders
were also trained at the SOA. In December 1981, the battalion
swept into the northeastern village of El Mozote and systematically
killed more than 200 men, women, and children, raping many of
the women, beheading many of the victims, and slitting the throats
of and hanging children.
All of these methods were put into practice
during the Vietnam War when the CIA created the infamous Phoenix
Program. Faced with a popular guerrilla movement on the ground
and growing protest over the number of U.S. soldiers killed in
the war, Vietnam became a virtual laboratory for developing counterinsurgency
techniques that could replace standard military intervention with
terror. Overseen by William Casey of the CIA, the object of the
Phoenix Program was to replace U.S. ground troops with a Vietnamese
force, under CIA and U.S. military command, that could round up,
torture, and kill suspected Vietcong leaders while the U.S. continued
to bomb the entire population from the sky. Of course, people
working for Phoenix didn't distinguish between "leaders"
and civilians, but rather swept entire areas and claimed everyone
they detained was Vietcong. The practice of setting quotas for
how many people Phoenix needed to kill-3,000 per week-only ensured
random murder.
As former U.S. military intelligence officer
K. Barton Osborn told a House committee, no one detained by Phoenix
for questioning lived through the process. Former CIA director
William Colby, who ran the Phoenix Program, claimed that more
than 20,000 people were killed by its agents; the South Vietnamese
government claimed more than twice that number. U.S. troops, along
with the CIA, not only massacred entire villages, but used torture
and summary execution to control the population. Osborn described
to Congress the catalog of horrors that Marine counterintelligence
and their Vietnamese collaborators inflicted:
The use of the insertion of the 6-inch
dowel into the canal of one of my detainee's ears and the tapping
through the brain until he died. The starving to death [in a cage]
of a Vietnamese woman who was suspected of being a part of a local
political education cadre in one of the local villages.... [T]he
use of electronic gear such as sealed telephones attached to...both
the women's vagina and the men's testicles [to] shock them into
submission.
Other techniques included throwing prisoners
out of planes alive and cutting off fingers, fingernails, ears,
and sexual organs.
In many ways, the CIA intervention in
Guatemala mirrored what they had done in Vietnam. As in Vietnam,
the U.S. faced a popular movement on the ground. Despite a U.S.-engineered
coup in 1954-paid for by the CIA and the United Fruit Company-popular
resistance to U.S.-based companies and handpicked rulers continued
to threaten U.S. interests in the area. In response to widespread
protest, the U.S. set up a "counterinsurgency" base
in Guatemala in 1962. The base, staffed by U.S. special forces
and Guatemalan officers schooled at the SOA's original location
in Panama, trained death squads to quell protest and kill dissidents.
The effort was beefed up in 1966, when the U.S. sent a military
officer to retrain and arm the Guatemalan military. Parallel to
SOA military training, more than 30,000 Guatemalan police had
received training from the U.S. Office of Public Safety by 1970.
The results were catastrophic. Between
1966 and 1968 alone, U.S.-trained death squads killed between
3,000 and 8,000 people, according to Amnesty International. By
1976, the numbers had swelled to 20,000 murdered or disappeared.
Death squads used techniques gleaned from the U.S. war in Vietnam
to torture and terrorize their victims, including electric shock
with field telephones, covering their victims' heads with plastic
bags filled with insecticide, and dropping suspected guerrillas
from planes alive. One CIA-backed Guatemalan army unit known as
"G2"-infamous for its brutality and liberal use of torture-even
had its own crematorium.
General Hector Gramajo, who taught counterinsurgency
courses at the SOA in 1967, described the general approach that
continued throughout the 1980s. Gramajo told the Harvard International
Review:
We have created a more humanitarian, less
costly strategy, to be more compatible with the democratic system.
We instituted civil affairs [in 1982], which provides development
for 70 percent of the population, while we kill 30 percent. Before,
the strategy was to kill 100 percent.
Since the CIA-engineered coup in 1953,
more than 200,000 Guatemalans have died at the hands of military,
police, and death squad leaders-many of them sponsored by the
CIA and trained at the SOA.
"Our kind of dictator"
In 1989, the U.S. invaded Panama, supposedly
to root out the dictator and international drug runner Manuel
Noriega. President Bush portrayed Noriega as a brutal dictator
and vowed to "end 21 years of dictatorship" by invading
the country and arresting Noriega. Bush failed to mention that
Noriega had been on the CIA payroll for 10 years-including the
year 1976, when Bush headed up the CIA-collecting up to $100,000
annually.
Noriega had turned against U.S. interests
by challenging the 1977 treaty that would hand over U.S. military
bases and control of the Panama Canal by 2000, as well as by continuing
to support "enemies" of the U.S. such as Cuba. Fearing
that defiance against U.S. rule might spread throughout Latin
America, the U.S. decided to pull the plug on its handpicked dictator.
Under auspices of "bringing Noriega to justice," the
U.S. Iaunched the largest air raid since the Vietnam War-not on
Noriega, but on the civilian population of one of Panama's poorest
neighborhoods, El Chorillo.
Claiming that El Chorillo harbored nationalist
supporters of the Noriega regime, the U.S. Ieveled the neighborhood.
At least 15 square blocks-home to 30,000 people-were demolished
by 24,000 troops using the newest equipment in the U.S. arsenal.
Dick Cheney, who was then secretary of defense, tried to subdue
critics with the idea that by using the latest and most sophisticated
war machines, including the stealth fighter bomber, the U.S. had
actually helped save lives in Panama. "The reason we used
this particular aircraft," Cheney explained, "is because
of its great accuracy. We dropped, I believe, two 2,000-pound
bombs near Rio Hato to pave the way for the Rangers when they
landed there and to stun and disorient the [Panamanian troops].
And it really worked, because it reduced both Panamanian and U.S.
casualties."
One resident of El Chorillo, a mother
taking care of her seven-year-old son when the U.S. invaded, tells
a different story:
I was ironing when I heard the first sound
of machine guns firing.... It was around 11:30. We went out on
the balcony where you could see little red lights, which the neighbors
said were projectiles. Thirty or forty minutes later, four helicopters
appeared headed toward the Central Barracks. The helicopters were
firing all kinds of weapons because you could hear the bursts
and explosions were of different intensities....
The lights in the neighborhood went out
and houses began to burn. It was chaos. People tried to leave
their burning homes but found themselves between two fires....
[T]anks and armored cars and soldiers were advancing on foot,
firing. We could hardly believe it. My son was crying, terrified.
The best my sister and I could try to do was protect him with
our bodies.
With every bomb blast the building shook
and the windows shattered. At some point I made my way to the
kitchen and somehow brought back the tanks of propane [cooking]
gas back to the bathroom, which seemed the most sheltered spot,
because the gas tanks were exploding in a lot of the apartments
as they were hit by bullets.
U.S. soldiers wove through the wreckage
setting fire to homes that survived the bombing attacks. The bombing
and burning left at least 20,000 poor and working-class Panamanians
homeless.
U.S. troops surrounded and took over hospitals,
in some cases falsifying death reports to match U.S. propaganda
that claimed the death toll was low. At one hospital, eight of
the nine doctors on duty at the time of the invasion were fired
or driven into hiding after they were tagged Noriega supporters.
U.S. troops not only neglected to count the number of dead, but
covered up the massacre by burying bodies in at least 14 unmarked
mass graves. Witnesses even saw U.S. troops using flame-throwers
to incinerate bodies, presumably also to disguise the true death
toll. While it has been impossible to get an accurate death count
due to U.S. intervention, many estimate that between one thousand
and four thousand Panamanians died in the attacks.
The U.S. not only grabbed Noriega under
absolutely no legal authority-but also arrested and detained many
others, including Dr. Romulo Escobar Behancourt, chief negotiator
of the 1977 treaty, who was arrested and held for five days. They
also held several union leaders for three weeks on no charges,
destroyed offices of political and human rights organizations,
and shut down newspapers that had been critical of U.S. policy.
U.S. troops stole 15,000 boxes of Panamanian government documents,
which to this day they have refused to return. One source estimates
that U.S. forces arrested 7,000 people during the invasion.
According to the FBI, terrorism is distinguished
as illegal violence. The U.S. attack on Panama defied all international
law, including Geneva convention protocol prohibiting the slaying
of civilians in warfare. The United Nations, the Organization
of American States, and most nations condemned the invasion. Regardless
of Noriega's own crimes, the U.S. had absolutely no jurisdiction
in Panama and thus no legal claim on Noriega, yet they abducted
him and brought him to trial in a U.S. court.
The U.S. invasion of Panama, justified
in part as a war on drugs, is only one example of U.S. hypocrisy
when it comes to combating "narcoterrorism." Not only
did key U.S. officials wine and dine Noriega throughout the 1970s
and 1980s with full knowledge of his involvement in the drug trade,
but Noriega's successor, Guillermo Endara-handpicked by the U.S.-
was equally if not more involved in narcotics trafficking. In
fact, Endara, as nearly all other senior government officials
who were given Washington's stamp of approval, was head of a Panamanian
bank known for laundering drug money.
Currently, the U.S. claims to be waging
a "war on drugs" by funding the Colombian government,
which is the third-largest recipient of U.S. aid. Yet a 1994 Amnesty
International report showed that government-supported paramilitary
groups, which have killed 20,000 people since 1986 - many of them
human rights workers, union leaders, and heads of political organizations-are
knee-deep in the drug trade. Many of the death squad leaders responsible
for atrocities in Columbia were trained at the SOA. More than
10,000 Colombian military personnel have been trained at the SOA-more
than any other country.
Fighting terrorism: The new cover for
imperialism
Around the world, the U.S. government
is using the tragedy of September 11 not only to justify a war
against Afghanistan, but to lay the basis for wars in many other
countries as well. Already, the warlords in Washington have hinted
that more strategic locations in terms of U.S. interests may be
next in line for U.S. or NATO military intervention-for example,
Iraq.
Before the dust had settled over New York
and D.C., "antiterrorism experts" were already concluding
that the U.S. needed to get back to the kind of good old-fashioned
covert operations they had engaged in during the Cold War, including
bringing more "unsavory characters" onto the CIA payroll.
The U.S. hopes to use the war on "terrorism" like they
used the war on "communism"-as a permanent excuse to
project its power abroad, using assassinations, proxy armies,
dictators, secret terror cells, and direct military intervention.
We should oppose them every step of the way.
Katherine Dwyer is a member of the International
Socialist Review editorial board.
Rogue State: United States
Global Secrets and Lies
Index
of Website
Home Page