excerpts from the book
The New World Order
by H.G. Wells
Filiquarian Publishing, 2007 [original
published in 1950]
p16
Everywhere now it is difficult to get adequate, far-reaching publicity
for outspoken discussion of the way the world is going, and the
political, economic and social forces that carry it along.
p16
The Press, the publishing and bookselling organisations in our
free countries, provide a very ill-organised and inadequate machinery
for the ventilation and distribution of thought.
p17
Publishers publish for nothing but safe profits; it would astound
a bookseller to tell him he was part of the world's educational
organisation or a publisher's traveller, that he existed for any
other purpose than to book maximum orders for best sellers and
earn a record commission - letting the other stuff, the highbrow
stuff and all that, go hang. They do not understand that they
ought to put public service before gain. They have no inducement
to do so and no pride in their function. Theirs is the morale
of a profiteering world. Newspapers like to insert brave-looking
articles of conventional liberalism, speaking highly of peace
and displaying a noble vagueness about its attainment; now we
are at war they will publish the fiercest attacks upon the enemy
because such attacks are supposed to keep up the fighting spirit
of the country; but any ideas that are really loudly and clearly
revolutionary they dare not circulate at all. Under these baffling
conditions there is no thorough discussion of the world outlook
whatever, anywhere. The democracies are only a shade better than
the dictatorships in this respect. It is ridiculous to represent
them as realms of light at issue with darkness.
p17
Newspapers like to insert brave-looking articles of conventional
liberalism, speaking highly of peace and displaying a noble vagueness
about its attainment; now we are at war they will publish the
fiercest attacks upon the enemy because such attacks are supposed
to keep up the fighting spirit of the country; but any ideas that
are really loudly and clearly revolutionary they dare not circulate
at all. Under these baffling conditions there is no thorough discussion
of the world outlook whatever, anywhere. The democracies are only
a shade better than the dictatorships in this respect. It is ridiculous
to represent them as realms of light at issue with darkness.
p17
There is no thorough discussion of the world outlook whatever,
anywhere. The democracies are only a shade better than the dictatorships
in this respect. It is ridiculous to represent them as realms
of light at issue with darkness.
p17
There exist no adequate media for the utterance and criticism
and correction of any broad general convictions.
p18
There are a few people here and there reading and thinking in
disconnected fragments. This is all the thinking our world is
doing in the face of planetary disaster. The universities, bless
them! are in uniform silent.
p18
Free speech and vigorous publication. is the thing best worth
fighting for.
p19
To get together with other people to argue and discuss, to think
and organise and then implement thought is the first duty of every
reasonable man.
p23
if one could wipe out all the issues of the present [WWII} conflict,
we should still be confronted with the essential riddle, which
is the abolition of the boundaries of most existing sovereign
states and their merger in some larger Pax. We have to do that
if any supportable human life is to go on. Treaties and mutual
guarantees are not enough. We have surely learnt enough about
the value of treaties during the last half-century to realise
that... We have to gather human affairs together under one common
war-preventing control.
p29
Collectivisation means the handling of the common affairs of mankind
by a common control responsible to the whole community. It means
the suppression of go-as-you-please in social and economic affairs
just as much as in international affairs. It means the frank abolition
of profitseeking and of every device by which human beings contrive
to be parasitic on their fellow man.
p29
The rich, the powerful generally, the more intelligent and acquisitive
have got away with things, and sweated, oppressed, enslaved, bought
and frustrated the less intelligent, the less acquisitive and
the unwary. The Haves in every generation have always got the
better of the Have-nots, and the Have-nots have always resented
the privations of their disadvantage.
p31
In the unplanned scramble of human life through the centuries
of the horse-and-foot period the incessantly recurring outbreaks
of the losers against the winners have never once produced any
permanent amelioration of the common lot, or greatly changed the
features of the human community.
p31
The Have-nots have never produced the intelligence and the ability
and the Haves have never produced the conscience, to make a permanent
alteration of the rules of the game. Slave revolts, peasant revolts,
revolts of the proletariat have always been fits of rage, acute
social fevers which have passed. The fact remains that history
produces no reason for supposing that the Have-nots, considered
as a whole, have available any reserves of directive and administrative
capacity and disinterested devotion, superior to that of the more
successful classes. Morally, intellectually, there is no reason
to suppose them better.
p31
The Have-nots have never produced the intelligence and the ability
and the Haves have never produced the conscience, to make a permanent
alteration of the rules of the game.
p31
The idea of a right-minded Proletariat ready to take things over
is a dream.
p42
Natural resources are being exhausted at a great rate, and the
increased output goes into war munitions whose purpose is destruction,
and into sterile indulgences no better than waste.
p45
It is easy to make an unemployed young man into a Fascist or gangster,
but it is hard to turn him back to any decent social task.
p46
The New Deal is plainly an attempt to achieve a working socialism
and avert a social collapse in America; it is extraordinarily
parallel to the successive 'policies" and "Plans"
of the Russian experiment. Americans shirk the word "socialism",
but what else can one call it?
p47
The British oligarchy, demoralised and slack with the accumulated
wealth of a century of advantage, bought off social upheaval for
a time by the deliberate and socially demoralising appeasement
of the dole. It has made no adequate effort to employ or educate
these surplus people; it has just pushed the dole at them.
p47
The British Empire has shown itself the least constructive of
all governing networks. It produces no New Deals, no Five Year
Plans; it keeps on trying to stave off its inevitable dissolution
and carry on upon the old lines - and apparently it will do that
until it has nothing more to give away.
p48
[The British oligarchy] by a string of almost incredible blunders,
have entangled what is left of their Empire in a great war to
"end Hitler", and they have absolutely no suggestion
to offer their antagonists and the world at large, of what is
to come after Hitler. Apparently they hope to paralyse Germany
in some as yet unspecified fashion and then to go back to their
golf links or the fishing stream and doze by the fire after dinner.
That is surely one of the most astounding things in history, the
possibility of death and destruction beyond all reckoning and
our combatant governments have no idea of what is to follow when
the overthrow of Hitler is accomplished.
p48
The British Empire remains, paying its way down to ultimate bankruptcy,
buying itself a respite from the perplexing problems of the future,
with the accumulated wealth and power of its past. It is rapidly
becoming the most backward political organisation in the world.
p49
An idiot with a revolver can murder a family. He remains an idiot.
p51
We have to collectivise the world as one system with practically
everyone playing a reasonably satisfying part in it. For sound
practical reasons, over and above any ethical or sentimental considerations,
we have to devise a collectivisation that neither degrades nor
enslaves.
p53
There is a strong opposition on the part of great interests in
America to the President [Franklin Roosevelt] who has made himself
the spear-head of the collectivising drive; they want to put the
brake now on his progressive socialisation of the nation, and
quite possibly, at the cost of increasing social friction, they
may slow down the drift to socialism very considerably. But it
is unbelievable that they dare provoke the social convulsion that
would ensue upon a deliberate reversal of the engines or upon
any attempt to return to the glorious days of big business, wild
speculation and mounting unemployment before 1927. They will merely
slow down the drive. For in the world now all roads lead to socialism
or social dissolution.
p59
What are called "democracies" suffer greatly from the
rule of old men who have not kept pace with the times.
p93
The establishment of a progressive world socialism in which the
freedoms, health and happiness of every individual are protected
by a universal law based on a re-declaration of the rights of
man, and wherein there is the utmost liberty of thought, criticism
and suggestion, is the plain, rational objective before us now.
Only the effective realisation of this objective can establish
peace on earth and arrest the present march of human affairs to
misery and destruction.
p94
Our present electoral methods which give no choice but a bilateral
choice to the citizen and so force a two-party system upon him,
is a mere caricature of representative government. It has produced
upon both sides of the Atlantic, big,
stupid, and corrupt party machines.
p94
Both Parliament and
Congress are essentially similar in their fundamental quality.
They trade in titles, concessions and the public
welfare ... It is an open question whether they are much more
responsive to popular feeling than
the Dictators we denounce so unreservedly as the antithesis of
democracy. They betray a great
disregard of mass responses. They explain less. They disregard
more. The Dictators have to go on
talking and talking, not always truthfully but they have to talk.
A dumb Dictator is
inconceivable.
p97
I do not know how sane men in America are going to set about relaxing
the stranglehold of the Constitution, get control of their own
country out of the hands of those lumpish, solemnly cunning politicians
... how they are going to abolish the spoils system, discover,
and educate to expand a competent civil service able to redeem
the hampered promises of the New Deal and pull America into line
with the reconstruction of the rest of the world.
Socialism watch
New
World Order page
Home Page