The Real Authors of the Congo
Crimes. Nkunda has been arrested but who will arrest Kagame ?
by Prof. Peter Erlinder
http://globalresearch.ca/, February
2, 2009
On January 24, Rwandan President Paul
Kagame sent 4,000 troops into the Congo to arrest rebel "tutsi"-warlord,
Laurent Nkunda, and wipe-out the remaining "hutu-genocidaires"
lurking in the eastern Congo . As the New York Times reported
in early December 2008, Nkunda is a former Rwandan Army officer
and many of his troops also came from Rwanda , including child-soldiers
recruited with Rwandan assistance.
The arrest was a surprise because Rwanda 's military and Kagame,
himself, had been supporting Nkunda's "terror" in the
eastern Congo for years. The Times later reported that Nkunda
is not actually imprisoned in Rwanda , and that the real reason
for the "arrest" may have been that he had become a
political liability for Kagame. He simply knows too much about
Rwandan crimes in the Congo and during the 1994 Rwandan "genocide"
for Kagame to permit him to remain "on the loose."
And, with good reason.
Over the past two years, many different sources have exposed
the ongoing crimes of the Kagame government and military, both
before and after Kagame seized power in Rwanda in July 1994.
Long a favorite of the Clinton and Bush administrations (U.S.
diplomatic recognition was immediate, and U.S. military advisors
were in Rwanda within days), Kagame's crimes are reaching huge
proportions that require him, and his U.S. admirers, to do something
to divert attention from Kagame's own responsiblity for Nkunda's
crimes, as well as many, many others, committed over the past
two-decades, including "genocide."
UN and Media Confirm: "Kagame is
the Author of Massive Congo Crimes"
In addition to the Times article, in early December Kagame's Congo
crimes were further documented in a December 12, 2008 UN Security
Council-commissioned report that describes Rwanda 's 12-year occupation
of a huge part of the Congo 5-times larger than Rwanda , itself.
The UN report, which was also widely reported by the international
media, makes clear that the Kagame's Rwandan-elites, and well-connected
Ugandans in the north, are getting rich on the resources of the
Congo , while killing more than 6-million Africans in the process.
More people are being killed in the Congo every 4-6 months than
the 250,000 that have been killed in Darfur in the past 10-years,
allegedly by a Sudanese government the U.S. opposes.
A fact that raises disturbing questions
about why the international "human rights" community
has been relatively quiet about the massive crimes in the Congo
, by surrogates the U.S. supports.
But this is not really new information
for anyone paying close attention to the tragedy unfolding in
the Congo . According to Security Council reports in 2001, 2002,
2003 and 2008; reports by third-world "raw-materials watchdog"
Global Witness; and, even President Clinton's former Assistant
Secretary of State for Africa, Herman J. Cohen, (IHT December
13, 2008), Rwandan and Ugandan invasions of the Congo since 1996
have been fueled by the grab for Congo's raw materials, and that
neither Nkunda nor "hutu-militias" are the real reasons
for the decades-long war, that again threatens to explode, in
a repeat of the1998-2002 "First "World War of Africa."
Kagame's "About Face" on Nkunda:
A Strategy for His Own Survival
The four UN reports, make clear that Rwanda has used the presence
of Rwandan refugees in the Congo as justification for Rwanda 's
"resource grab." Of the 2-million Rwandans who fled
Kagame's regime, only a small number could possibly have been
involved in 1994 crimes and it is their sons and grandsons who
are in the camps in the Congo , today. The arrest of Nkunda is
yet another fig-leaf to cover the naked plunder that preceded
Nkunda's Congo adventure, and will go on after his "arrest",
at least until Kagame of Rwanda and Museveni of Uganda, are compelled
to withdraw from the Congo fields of "blood-diamonds,"
"blood-casserite (tin)" and "blood-coltan (cellphones)"
that have turned their respective capitals into international
trading centers for mineral riches not found in either country.as
UN reports over many years have described.
Kagame's abrupt "about face" in supporting Nkunda does
nothing to reduce Rwanda's long-established resource grab-inspired
military dominance of the eastern Congo, but does show that Kagame
is being forced to change his tactics, to disguise Rwanda's actual
role in the creating and supporting violence wracking the African
Great Lakes region. The most recent invasion to arrest Nkunda
is a clever diversionary tactic. But, the UN report and Nkunda's
"bad press" are not Mr. Kagame's only problems of late.
Kagame's Problems Deepen as Proof of His
Own Crimes Grows
Following the December 2008 UN report, the Netherlands and Sweden
cut-off all foreign aid to Rwanda , and others are considering
doing so too. Other EU countries are taking their own actions
as the true nature of the Kagame regime is being revealed. In
early 2008, Spain indicted 40-leading members of Kagame's government
which followed a late 2006 French indictment charging Kagame and
his followers with assassinating former Rwandan and Burundian
presidents, the crime that triggered 1994 civilian-on-civilian
killings in Rwanda.
The Spanish indictment details genocidal-style killings of more
than 300,000 civilians by Kagame's troops during, and after, the
1994 war. Before this indictment, the defendants in the dock
at the ICTR had been blamed for all the mass-killings in Rwanda
. But, because only the losing-side in the Rwanda war are in
the dock, it is clear that the story of the "Rwanda-genocide"
will have to be re-examined.
Particularly after it was revealed last year that U.S. Ambassador
Pierre Prosper ordered ICTR prosecutor Carla Del Ponte to be removed
from office, when she insisted on prosecuting Kagame for the assasination
of the former president, the crime that touched-off the "Rwanda
genocide" because U.S. policy was to protect Kagame, despite
the evidence of his guilt.
In November 2008, Germany also arrested one of Kagame's retinue
under INTERPOL warrants based on the Spanish and French indictment.
But, perhaps the least noticed, but potentially most important
exposure of the manipulation of the " Rwanda genocide"
story to "cover-up" the crimes of Kagame's military
and government occurred at the UN Tribunal for Rwanda in December
2008.
The UN Rwanda Tribunal December 2008:
"No Genocide Conspiracy or Planning"
On December 18, 2008, a three-judge panel in the Military-1 case
at the UN tribunal acquitted the top four military officers of
the former Rwandan government of charges of "conspiracy to
commit genocide" and "genocide planning"which completely
rejects the whole "Rwanda-story" that has been told
by the Kagame regime July 1994, as a way of explaining the massacres
that occurred during the 100-assault to seize power that began
with Kagame's assassination of the presidents of Rwanda and Burundi
on April 6, 1994.
Not only were the four officers acquitted of conspiracy and planning
genocide, including "architect of the genocide" Col.
Theoneste Bagosora, the highest ranking officer, General Gratien
Kabiligi, was acquitted of all charges and was released from more
than 10-years of custody. The three-judge panel in the Military-1
case was the first to in the history of the Tribunal to have been
presented with long-suppressed UN and US government files that
make clear that Kagame and his RPF were the aggressors and Kagame's
military-strategy actually prevented both sides from using troops
to stop the massacres the assassination of the two presidents
touched off.[2]
The recently revealed documents, and testimony at the UN Tribunal
,confirm that massive civilian-on-civilian violence was predicted
to erupt in Rwanda as a consequence of war, because of similar
massacres that occurred in neighboring Burundi in late 1993, when
the first popularly-elected Burundian president was assassinated
by Kagame's Burundi-military allies. In fact, in late 1993 the
US ambassador to Rwanda personally warned Kagame that he would
be responsible for the same kind of massive violence, if he resumed
the war.
Now evidence ICTR evidence shows that Kagame not only resumed
the war, but assassinated two presidents as the opening shot,
triggering the same massive killings that had already happened
in Burundi six months before.
Previously suppressed UN documents also show that two-weeks after
he assassinated Rwandan President Habyarimanaalong with a second
Burundian president, Kagame told UN General Dallaire that he
would not use his troops to stop the massacres because he was
winning the war, and the civilian deaths were only "collateral
damage for his their war-plan. The April 22, 1994 memo reporting
this conversation is in the ICTR evidence.
Kagame also repeatedly refused a ceasefire, proposed by the former
military to use troops to stop the massacres touched-off by Habyarimana's
assassination. Documents from the former government repeatedly
asking for a ceasefire, and Kagame's rejections, are also in the
ICTR record that the 3-judge panel had before it.
The Unraveling of U.S./UK-Assisted "Cover-up"
of Kagame's Crimes
But, the formerly suppressed documents also reveal that U.S. Secretary
of State Warren Christopher knew of Kagame's mass-crimes no later
than Sept 17, 1994. Other documents confirm a U.S.-engineered
"cover-up" of Kagame's crimes has been going on since
that time. UN documents confirm that the UN knew about mass civilian-killings
by Kagame's forces by May 17, 1994, at the latest.
The documents also establish that the UN prosecutor and former
Canadian Supreme Court Justice, Louise Arbour, knew that Kagame
had assassinated the former President in 1997, but refused to
act despite the recommendation a former FBI agent; an Australian
Queen's Prosecutor; and UN Gen. Dallaire's own Chief of Military
Intelligence. First she refused to prosecute, then shut down the
investigation team completely. All of this was merely prelude
to Bush administration Ambassador Pierre Prosper removing Ms.
Del Ponte from office in 2003, because of his usefulness to the
U.S.
Now we know that, because Kagame's Rwanda crimes were covered-up
by the U.S. in 1994, and because he was not prosecuted at the
ICTR for the assassination of the previous president in 1997 (when
Bagosora and other Military-1 defendants were arrested) he has
been free to rape the Congo of its riches and to massacre millions.
The thousands of pages of UN and U.S. government documents in
ICTR evidence, and subsequent events in the Congo will require
re-writing the entire story of the " Rwanda genocide."
IF Kagame was the "good-guy" in Rwanda (despite the
ICTR evidence that the 100-days of hell that his assassination
of Habyarimana triggered, and which he told Dallaire in April
1994 was all part of his war-plan), the 2001-08 UN-Security Council
reports of Kagame's crimes in the Congo show that he and his military
must have done complete "about-face" of another kind,
as soon as they took power in Rwanda in July 1994.
Kagame Has Found Nkunda Expendable -
Will President Obama Continue U.S. It "Kagame Impunity"
Policy?
Mr. Nkunda must now appreciate the well-known risks of relying
on a patron for one's own powerthe patron may no-longer have need
of the client's services. Nkunda has merely found himself in
a situation similar to Panama 's U.S.-sponsored dictator Manuel
Noriega, whose arrest was used to justify the invasion of Panama
by the Bush-1 administration, when Noriega outlived his Cold War
usefulness.
And, this is not even the first time that Rwanda has invaded the
Congo remove a "no-longer-useful" leader. In 1996, Congo
's president for 30-plus "Cold War" years, Mobutu Sese
Seko, was removed in a joint Rwanda/Uganda U.S. and U.K.-supported
invasion, and replaced by Ugandan-client Joseph Kabila, once Mobutu's
value as an anti-communist "bulwark" was outweighed
by the public relations-downside of his well-known criminal rule.
At least Nkunda can be grateful that he didn't meet the same fate
as another leader who ran afoul of U.S. interests in the Congo
in an earlier era. In 1961 Patrice Lumumba was assassinated,
not arrested. Of course, if Nkunda begins to spill what he knows
about Kagame's crimes in Rwanda and the Congo ...."accidents"
can happen.
The most recent Rwandan invasion to throw Nkunda "under the
bus" in an effort to shore-up Kagame's image is actually
an admission of the deep trouble in which Kagame finds himself,
and the deep embarrassment he is becoming to his U.S. and U.K.
patrons, who have protected him for over a decade. The December
2008 UN report; the European indictments; and, the formerly suppressed
documents in ICTR evidence, taken together, raise the real possibility
that the Obama administration may find that Mr. Kagame has also
outlived his usefulness. When that day arrives, Paul Kagame's
name will be added to the long list of former U.S. clients who
outlived their usefulness and paid the price, like Noriega and
Mobutu, but also, lest we forget.Saddam Hussein.
THE ONLY MORAL U.S.-AFRICA POLICY: END
SUPPORT FOR KAGAME
Cutting off all western aid to Rwanda, like the Dutch and the
Swedes; arresting Kagame and his henchmen under existing INTERPOL
warrants, like the Germans; and prosecuting Kagame at the UN Rwanda
Tribunal, or the International Criminal Court, will save far more
African lives than any "foreign-aid for Africa" program
than President Obama or Secretary of State Clinton could possibly
conceive. One difficulty, of course, is that the "cover-up"
of Kagame's 1994 crimes in Rwanda was initiated under her predecessor
Warren Christopher.Bill Clinton 's Secretary of State. Which,
in turn, raises difficult questions about Clinton 's foreign policy
in central Africa , as well.
Professor Peter Erlinder teaches at the
Wm. Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul , MN
[1] Professor of Law, Wm. Mitchell College
of Law, St. Paul, MN; past-President, National Lawyers Guild,
NY; President, ICTR-ADAD (Association des Avocats de la Defence),
Arusha, TZ; Lead-counsel, ICTR-Military-1 Trial, Ntabakuze Defence.
651-290-6384/ peter.erlinder@wmitchell.edu
[2] In the interests of full disclosure: As Ntabakuze Lead Defence
Counsel, these documents were unearthed and put into ICTR evidence
for the first time by the author between 2005 and 2007.
Congo watch
Home Page