The Argentine Rebellion
by Roger Burbach
Z magazine, April 2002
Argentina is erupting in an unprecedented social upheaval
that could pose a new threat to the international financial system
and transform the country's politics. With an international debt
of $140 billion Argentina is the first country in years to formally
default on its loans. In Buenos Aires, the popular movement has
taken to the streets since mid-December with the slogan, "Que
se vayan todos," or "everyone has to be thrown out."
It is a call for the removal of the political establishment, including
the current president, Eduardo Duhalde, who took office in early
January. Along with Duhalde, the popular repudiation extends to
the two main political parties and alliances that back the government,
the Supreme Court, the national congress, and the financial interests
that dominate the country.
As Jose Luis Coraggio, the rector of a university in Buenos
Aires who is active in the opposition movement, declared: "The
repudiation of the politicians and the economic elites is complete.
None of them who are recognized can walk the streets without being
insulted or spit upon. It is impossible to predict what will happen.
Next month, or next week, Duhalde could be deposed, we could be
in a state of chaos, or we could be building a new country that
breaks with neo-liberal and capitalist orthodoxy."
Although Argentina captured the world's attention with the
massive social explosion in late December that ushered in five
presidents in less than two weeks, the crisis had been building
for years. Its foundations are in the neo-liberal model that Argentina
adopted in the early 1990s under Carlos Menem who served as president
from 1989 to 1999. The head of the old Peronist movement, or Justicalista
party as it is now called, Menem, along with government and party
bureaucrats, grew rich as national companies ranging from petroleum
and airline enterprises to telephone and water utilities were
sold off to foreign interests.
By the mid 1990s, Menem had tied the country firmly into the
international financial system by pegging the Argentine peso to
the U.S. dollar at the exchange rate of one to one. A rentier
class dominated the country as Argentina's productive and industrial
capacity was gutted. With the fixed exchange rate Argentine exports
became uncompetitive in international markets while cheap imports
flooded the country. Even Argentine's once dynamic agricultural
sector went into a state of decline. Today cereals are the nation's
only significant source of foreign exchange, as its once world-class
beef industry has lost its major export markets.
The massive demonstrations that erupted in December are commonly
referred to as "caserolazos," or protests in which demonstrators
bang on empty pots and pans symbolizing their inability to purchase
the basic necessities of life. In Buenos Aires, the caserolazos
usually occur every Friday when thousands of demonstrators descend
on the historic Plaza de Mayo, the site of the presidential palace
and the national congress. Many of the demonstrators march under
the banners of the barrios they come from where they gather in
popular assemblies. These barrio assemblies are rapidly becoming
autonomous centers of community participation that include a wide
variety of groups and individuals, ranging from unemployed and
independent trade unionists, to human rights organizations and
members of left or non-mainstream political parties.
Smaller, but very militant caserolazos have also been organized
against the banks. The middle class in particular is furious with
the banks, as the government has frozen long-term savings accounts,
many of which were in dollars. Starting in the middle of 2002
the government promises to repay the deposits-which total close
to $20 billion dollars-in 18 monthly installments in the national
currency that will be devalued by at least 40 percent. While proclaiming
the government doesn't have the money to pay off the savings accounts,
Duhalde has reneged on his early promise to not pay back the international
debt. He has also announced financial policies that amount to
a currency subsidy for large Argentine corporations when they
repay their foreign loans. It is small wonder that . many middle
class demonstrators, sometimes in suits, smash bank windows and
spray-paint slogans on bank walls such as "thieves,"
"traitors," and "looters." In addition to
mobilizing demonstrations, the popular assemblies in the barrios
often take on local issues and concerns. In one barrio for example
the assembly organized pickets to prevent the authorities from
closing down a baker who could not afford to pay his rent. Other
local assemblies are urging people who own their homes not to
pay property taxes, to instead turn the revenue over to hospitals
in their area that are in desperate need of medical supplies.
The assemblies also take up discussions of international issues.
As Lidia Pertieria, an assembly organizer notes, "one of
the rallying cries coming from our communities is "no more
foreign loans." New loans only mean more swindling and robbery
by our government officials."
The popular assemblies are emblematic of the upsurge in grassroots
organizing that is occurring throughout the country. The first
major protests against neo-liberal government policies began in
the interior of the country in 1996 and 1997 when unemployed workers
called "piqueteros," or picketers, blocked major highways
demanding jobs. By 2001 the blockading of strategic commercial
arteries had spread to the entire country. The piqueteros are
loosely organized in the Movement of Unemployed Workers that held
two national assemblies in August and September that brought together
a variety of social and nongovernmental organizations along with
the unemployed.
The piqueteros are notable for their participatory leadership.
They usually negotiate in large groups or assemblies with local
and regional governmental leaders to demand publicly financed
jobs in exchange for the lifting of blockades. Bargaining is done
in open groups to prevent the government from engaging in what
is called "clientalism," a long standing practice of
Argentine political leaders in which they negotiate with a handful
of representatives who are separated from their membership and
promised jobs or given bribes in order to sell out the rest of
the movement. The Peronist party, which was founded in the 1940s
with a large working class base, became particularly astute at
corrupting the labor movement by providing perks and special favors
to labor leaders in exchange for their support and allegiance
to the party.
The National Front Against Poverty, with over 60,000 members,
is another organization that has moved into the spotlight with
the economic crisis. It was established in 1999 by a group of
economists, sociologists and trade unionists to propose alternatives
to the neo-liberal order. In their first initiative, they collected
over a million signatures for a plan that was presented to congress
and dubbed "shock redistribution," an ironic reference
to the economic shock treatment imposed on many third world countries
by the International Monetary Fund. In contrast to the IMF, this
redistribution plan argues that the only way to reactivate the
economy is by putting funds into the hands of the country's poor,
not by slashing social programs and implementing financial policies
that favor the rich. In 2000 the Front set up polling booths around
the country and held a referendum in which over 3 million people
voted for the redistributive plan.
As Norma Filgueiras, one of the Front's organizers who participates
in the popular assemblies notes: "Today with 40 percent of
the country's 35 million people falling below the poverty line
we are discussing real alternatives that could help us at the
community level." A widely distributed four-page pamphlet
by the Front points out in easy to understand language how neo-liberal
economic policies can be reversed by funding local housing projects,
by helping small enterprises produce many articles (including
medicines) that are currently imported, by renationalizing industries
that were sold off by corrupt government officials, and by encouraging
economic solidarity and cooperation among individuals and groups
rather than "free market" competition.
During the four years that Argentina has been in economic
recession an alternative barter economy has emerged. It is estimated
that over two and a half million people are participating in local
exchanges called "nodos." People take their products
or commodities to the exchanges-fruits, vegetables, chickens,
jams, clothing, etc.,-where they get credit slips they use to
pick up products they need in return. One local textile manufacturer
who was on the verge of bankruptcy called together his workers
and told them that since he could no longer pay many of their
salaries he would instead turn over blankets produced in the factory
which the workers could either sell or take to the local nodos
to exchange for other commodities.
As Ricardo Malfe a psychologist on the social science faculty
of the University of Buenos Aires commented: "Who knows what
this will all lead to. In World War II Argentina was cut off from
international markets and we had the biggest manufacturing boom
in our history. Argentines, especially the middle classes, have
been noted for our individualism and narrow self-interest mentality.
Perhaps this crisis will force us to reshape the very way we view
ourselves, run our economy and organize our lives."
This, of course, would be a positive scenario for the popular
movement in Argentina. Military intervention appears to be out
of the question for the moment as the military is ranked even
lower than the political class in opinion polls. This is a consequence
of the human rights movement and particularly the "Madres
de la Plaza de Mayo," a group of mothers who began to march
regularly in the plaza in the late 1970s to protest the military's
assassination of their sons and daughters in what is called Argentina's
"dirty war." Today the Madres are a critical part of
the popular movement against the political and economic elites.
There are, however, long-term scenarios discussed in Argentine
political circles that suggest a civic-military alliance with
the backing of the national bourgeoisie. Carlos Menem, who led
the country into the neo-liberal nightmare, is thought by many
to be scheming a political comeback against Duhalde. Menem would
be the coalition's primary political mover, although not its titutlar
head since he is prevented by the constitution from holding the
presidential office again. But for now it looks like such an alliance
is checkmated as all of its potential members are discredited
by a mass movement that would not tolerate a return of the neo-liberal
order that sold the country out to foreign interests and precipitated
the country's economic catastrophe.
For the moment the piqueteros, the caserolazos, and the popular
assemblies are driving the political process, although where they
will be able to take the country is uncertain. Setting aside rosy
and totally unrealistic economic projections by government officials,
virtually no one sees an early end to the deep economic crisis,
meaning that social and political instability will prevail for
some time to come. As one political commentator stated, "the
only certainty in Argentina is that the future is uncertain."
South
America watch
Index
of Website
Home
Page