Israeli Occupation, Colonialism
and Apartheid
by Stephen Lendman
December 2009
The Cape Town, South Africa-based Human
Sciences Research Council (HSRC) "conduct(s) large-scale,
policy-relevant, social-scientific projects for public-sector
users, non-governmental organisations and international development
agencies," and disseminates its findings widely.
In May 2009, it issued a damning report
titled, "Occupation, Colonialism, Apartheid? A re-assessment
of Israel's practices in the occupied Palestinian territories
under international law." At the time John Dugard was the
UN's Special Human Rights Rapporteur for Occupied Palestine. At
his January 2007 suggestion, the study was undertaken "to
scrutinise (his) hypothesis from the perspective of international
law." It stated:
"Israel is clearly in military occupation
of the OPT (Occupied Palestinian Territories). At the same time,
elements of the occupation constitute forms of colonialism and
of apartheid, which are contrary to international law. What are
the legal consequences of a regime of prolonged occupation with
features of colonialism and apartheid for the occupied people,
the Occupying Power and third States?"
Given South Africa's past, the HSRC had
an "obvious interest" in pursuing these issues. After
15 months of research, its report concluded that:
"....Israel, since 1967, has been
the belligerent Occupying Power in the OPT, and that its occupation
of these territories has become a colonial enterprise, which implements
a system of apartheid."
Although occupation is legal after armed
conflict, it's intended only to be temporary. International law
also prohibits the unilateral annexation or permanent acquisition
of territory through force, and Fourth Geneva obligates signatories
to protect civilians in time of war and occupation.
Its Article 3 states:
"Persons taking no active part in
the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid
down their arms and those placed hors de combat (out of the fight)
by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all
circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction
founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth,
or any other similar criteria."
Its Article 4 defines "protected
persons" as follows:
"Persons protected by the Convention
are those who, at a given moment and in any manner whatsoever,
find themselves, in case of conflict or occupation, in the hands
of a Party to the conflict or Occupying Power of which they are
not nationals."
Its Article 49 states:
"Individual or mass forcible transfers,
as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory
to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other
country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their
motive." Neither shall "The Occupying Power....deport
or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory
it occupies."
In addition, numerous UN resolutions established
"no legal validity" for occupied land acquisitions or
settlement building. When violations of international law occur,
no nation may recognize or support the unlawful situation or the
state responsible.
In addition, colonialism and apartheid
are particularly serious international law breaches because they
fundamentally violate core legal order standards and values. The
International Court of Justice (ICJ) affirmed self-determination
as "one of the essential principles of contemporary international
law," obligating all states to respect and promote it. Colonialism
is in clear violation.
The 1960 Declaration on the Granting of
Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (the Declaration
on Colonialism), condems "colonialism in all its forms and
manifestations," including settlements deemed to be illegal.
According to the 1973 International Convention
for the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (the
Apartheid Convention), this practice is state-sanctioned discriminatory
"inhuman" racism "committed for the purpose of
establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of
persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically
oppressing them."
Apartheid is an international crime. The
above definition builds on the 1965 International Convention on
the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD).
In addition, the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal
Court calls apartheid a crime under the Court's jurisdiction.
Israel is flagrantly guilty but not yet held accountable.
International laws prohibiting colonialism
and apartheid are "peremptory," meaning they are "accepted
and recognized by the international community of States as a whole
as (standards) from which no derogation is permitted." Every
country is legally bound to respect and observe them. They're
also duty bound to:
-- work cooperatively to end individual
state violations;
-- not extend recognition to lawless ones;
nor
-- provide them aid in any form.
Legal Framework in the OPT
Applicable international law recognizes:
-- the Palestinians' right to self-determination;
-- the fact that Gaza, the West Bank and
East Jerusalem are illegally occupied;
-- that Israel has no sovereignty over
these Territories, only an earlier temporary administrative right
no longer applicable;
-- that land seizures are illegal; so
is the Separation Wall as the ICJ affirmed in 2004;
-- that the 2005 Gaza "disengagement"
left Israel in control; and
-- that, as an Occupying Power, international
law obligates Israel to "abide by the....rules of armed conflict
(and relevant human rights laws) in its administration of the
territories."
For over 42 years, Israel willfully violated
the law under a dual discriminatory regime. Its occupation and
land seizures are illegal. Its settlers are protected under civil
laws assuring them free movement and essential services. Palestinians
come under military law and its courts with procedures that violate
international judiciary standards. Israel's High Court affirmed
the bifurcated system that "discriminate(s) between these
two groups by according (them) very different rights, protections,
and life chances in the same territory." This system violates
the laws of armed conflict, and also the international legal colonialism
and apartheid prohibitions.
Under the Declaration on Colonialism,
this practice exists when states annex or otherwise lawlessly
retain territorial control and deny indigenous peoples their right
to self-determination. Israel does it six ways by:
-- violating the integrity of the Occupied
Territories:
-- prohibiting meaningful self-government;
-- integrating the area's economy into
its own;
-- controlling its resources;
-- denying the population economic enfranchisement,
free movement, expression, its historical heritage, their right
to develop and practice it, and equal justice under the law; and
-- maintaining a 42-year state of war,
including killings, targeted assassinations, mass arrests, incarcerations,
torture and abuse, and other degrading and humiliating treatment.
Under ICERD's Article 3, apartheid is
prohibited as a particularly egregious form of discrimination,
without precisely defining the practice. The Apartheid Convention
and Rome Statute went further with a better one and by criminalizing
certain apartheid-related acts - specifically, "inhuman (ones)
committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination
by one racial group of persons over any other and systematically
oppressing them."
Both focus on systematic, institutionalized
discrimination to achieve racial segregation and unchallenged
dominance. Under the Apartheid Convention's Article 2, HSRC determined
that:
-- Israeli measures deprive Palestinians
of their right to "life and liberty of person;"
-- they include state-sponsored violence;
killings; extrajudicial assassinations; arbitrary arrests and
incarcerations; torture and abuse; other cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment; kangaroo court justice in military tribunals; and administrative
detentions without charge, adequate access to counsel, trial,
or proper judicial review;
-- state-sponsored collective punishment
seriously impairing life and health, especially in Gaza under
siege;
-- Palestinians have no free and equal
participation in their political, social, economic and cultural
lives;
-- they're also denied their basic human
rights and freedoms with regard to free movement; their right
of return; to live anywhere in historic Palestine freely in the
land of their birth; and to a nationality through self-determination;
-- they're denied economic self-determination
and their right to work anywhere in historic Palestine;
-- their trade unions aren't recognized
so they can't represent Palestinians effectively;
-- under military occupation, their right
to education, medical care and other essential services is seriously
impaired;
-- censorship laws restrict free expression
and opinion;
-- military orders deny free assembly
and public gatherings of 10 or more persons without express permission;
non-violent gatherings are regularly suppressed with live ammunition,
rubber-coated steel bullets, tear gas, and various other weapons;
-- most Palestinian parties are considered
illegal; charities, cultural organizations and other institutions
and agencies connected to them are subjected to closure and attack;
-- home and community intrusions, beatings,
arrests, and killings occur regularly; and
-- all of these practices occur in extreme
form in Gaza under siege, the one difference being Jewish settlers
no longer reside there, but, at any time, Israel may decide to
return them and displace Palestinians by so doing.
The West Bank, in contrast, is balkanized
into cantons and enclaves in which group identity determines residence
and free entry. Jews have the choicest parts and keep expanding
them, leaving Palestinians shrinking amounts of the rest.
HSRC's report concluded that Israeli occupation,
colonialism and apartheid are "systematic and comprehensive,
as the exercise of the Palestinian population's right to self-determination
has been frustrated in all of its principal modes of expression."
Comparing Israeli and South African Apartheid
Despite differences, Israeli and South
African apartheid practices are defined by similar dominant features.
Three legislative pillars underpinned South Africa's:
-- the first demarcated people into racial
groups through the 1950 Population Registration Act; it institutionalized
racial discrimination by affording special rights, privileges
and services to whites and denied them to blacks;
-- the second segregated people by geographic
areas, allocated by law to different racial groups; it restricted
passage from assigned areas to others to insure white supremacy;
overall, it constituted "grand apartheid" by establishing
"Homelands" or "Bantustans" in which "denationalized"
blacks were transferred and forced to reside, while whites got
special political rights denied blacks;
-- the third was a matrix of draconian
security laws and policies, employed to suppress opposition and
reinforce racial domination "by providing for administrative
detention, torture, censorship, banning, and assassination."
In the OPT, Israel has the same three
pillars:
The first legally establishes Jewish identity
and affords preferential legal status and material benefits to
Jews alone. Palestinians are discriminated against as inferior
by religion, ethnicity, and subsequent social status.
Israel's citizenship laws underpin the
system under which Jews anywhere in the world automatically qualify
for citizenship in an exclusive Jewish state. The 1950 Law of
Return defines Jewishness and begins saying:
"Every Jew has the right to immigrate
to this country."
The 1952 Citizenship Law granted automatic
citizenship to Jewish immigrants, while denying non-Jews similar
rights. The 2003 Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law banned
Palestinian family unification, giving Jews alone special rights.
The second pillar reflects Israel's policy
to expropriate choice land, segregate and dominate. It plays out
through separating East Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank,
seizing increasing amounts of it for settlement development, and
separating Palestinians by means of walls, barriers, checkpoints,
separate roads, a discriminatory permit and ID system, and a militarized
matrix of control.
In contrast, Jews have free movement and
freedom. The "geographic fragmentation has the effect of
crushing Palestinian socio-economic life, securing Palestinian
vulnerability to Israeli economic dominance, and of enforcing
a rigid segregation of Palestinian and Jewish populations,"
similar to South African apartheid.
The third pillar is Israel's "invocation
of security" to justify sweeping restrictions on Palestinian
free expression, opinion, assembly, association and movement and
enforce them through suppression of dissent, conflict, state-sponsored
violence, extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests and incarcerations,
torture and abuse, and other kinds of cruel, inhuman and degrading
treatment.
In sum, these policies are "integrated
and complementary elements of an institutionalised and oppressive
system of Israeli domination and oppression over Palestinians
as a group; that is, a system of apartheid," under which
Israeli repression is harsh, discriminatory, and illegal under
international law.
Although Israel bares primary responsibility,
the international community must act cooperatively to remedy the
situation as follows:
-- require Israel start dismantling the
structures and institutions of occupation, colonialism and apartheid;
-- have it pay reparations for decades
of lawlessness; and
-- assure Palestinians can exercise their
right of self-determination or have equal rights as citizens in
one Israeli/Palestinian state.
"The realisation of self-determination
and the prohibition on apartheid are peremptory norms of international
law from which no derogation is permitted." These principles
obligate the entire world community to cooperate to end all breaches
everywhere, including in Occupied Palestine. Failure to do so
constitutes "an internationally wrongful act." Further,
any state aiding another's lawlessness axiomatically becomes complicit
in the commission of crimes, requiring other nations to hold it
accountable.
International organizations like the UN
bear equal responsibility. As the ICJ stated in its Separation
Wall ruling, this body is obligated to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict, one it helped initiate through its 1947 partition plan
under UN General Assembly Resolution 181. At a time Jews comprised
one-third of the population, it gave them 56% of the choicest
land, the rest to Palestinians with Jerusalem designated an international
city.
HSRC and John Dugard urged the ICJ to
rule on this matter in accordance with the UN Charter's Article
96 authorizing "The General Assembly or the Security Council
(to) request (an ICJ) advisory opinion on any legal question."
Under Article 65 of the ICJ's Statute, it "may give an advisory
opinion on any legal question at the request of whatever body
may be authorized by or in accordance with the Charter of the
United Nations to make such a request."
According to HSRC, at issue is the following:
"Do the policies and practices of
Israel within the (OPT) violate the norms prohibiting apartheid
and colonialism; and, if so, what are the legal consequences arising
from Israel's policies and practices, considering the rules and
principles of international law, including the International Convention
on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination, the
International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of
the Crime of Apartheid, the Declaration on the Granting of Independence
to Colonial Countries and Peoples, UN General Assembly (1960)
Resolution 1514 (on granting independence to colonial countries
and peoples), and other relevant Security Council and General
Assembly resolutions?"
After 61 years of displacement and 42
years of occupation, these matter remain unresolved.
Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate
of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago
and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Stephen
Lendman page
Israel
watch
Home Page